Best chance of an upset: Pacquiao

What about the massive amount of acne on his chest and back that he showed up with in the Alvarado fight?

 

it is the same. its just that accusing one guy with no concrete evidence is going to hurt one set of butts, and accusing the other will hurt a different set. either youre innocent until proven guilty, or youre not, it applies to jmm, pac, and floyd.
sure, you can have youre suspicions, as i do, but dont discard some evidence and spotlight other, just to fit your agenda.

 

You really are stupid. I do in fact think that JMM has been doping. But NO ONE can prove that or state for a fact that he has been like you are trying to. You're "proof" being that he works with a guy who has been associated with PEDs and that he hasn't fought Pacquiao with VADA testing does not actually hold up to PROVE anything. You can connect dots but once again that doesn't prove anything. As ****ed up as it is he is innocent until proven guilty, which you cannot do.

 

Rofl @ the butthurt Pac fans whining about JMM being on roids.

They will never let 12-08-2012 go.

Deal with it.

 

Good to see Kell Brook in there to out the re****s.

 

I gave JMM the benefit of the doubt (as difficult as it was for me as a Pac fan), but then he showed up to the Alvarado fight w/ boils and pimples all over his chest and back (dead giveaway for long term doping). That's as good any evidence that I need.