Best chins ever, p4p

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Luigi1985, Nov 17, 2007.


  1. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    I think a fighter being hurt should be the gauge here, rather than whether he went down or not.

    Going down can be caused from things like balance as well as being hurt.

    E.g. Duran went down twice from Dejesus hooks, but he was never hurt in either case. I wouldn't hold it against him and claim his chin wasn't first class simply because he went down. It was more a balance issue than anything really, (though I'm not denying for a second that DeJesus had good power).

    On the flip side, Hector Camacho didn't go down against Rosario, but his legs were trembling all over the place and he ran for his life to survive the fight. THAT to me shows a weaker chin than does Duran's getting dumped on his ass twice and coming back and resuming the attack.
     
  2. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    Its not all about being hurt combined with the knockdown. Duran maybe wasn't hurt against De Jesus, but landing on his ass twice over the first two fights with De Jesus works against him. Thumping left hooks put him on his trunks.

    The type of knockdown I don't take too serious, De La Hoya's against Whitaker. Slip/punch knockdown with no damaging effects. Some referees might have called it a slip. Action replays from above clearly showed De La Hoya's foot was giving way at the same time the punch landed. If the punch never landed, more than likely De La Hoya would not have went down. Correctly scored a knockdown.
     
  3. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004

    :huh
     
  4. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    You really don't understand do you?. Chavez had a brilliant chin, but he was knocked down against Randall and Tszyu. Some other fighters don't get knocked off their feet, no matter if they are 25 and in their prime, or washed up at 35. Thats the difference between someone like Chavez and McCullough. Both had similar styles, they came forward and took two to land one.

    Arguably McCullough fought harder punchers, even though he competed at lighter weights. I'd say Hamed and Morales, featherweight and super-bantamweight respectively, were bigger punchers in those divisions than any opponent Chavez faced in the divisions he fought.
     
  5. Pat_Lowe

    Pat_Lowe Active Member Full Member

    1,194
    15
    Feb 26, 2006
    Rosario was one of, if not the biggest lightweight punchers ever. Mayweather was also a huge hitter. Not to mention De La Hoya, LaPorte etc etc. He faced some pretty big hitters
     
  6. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    True. Probably Rosario comes closest. Hamed hits harder at featherweight than Rosario at lightweight though, IMO.

    McCullough's chin never let him down when past his prime, the same can't be said for Chavez.

    Remember, Chavez had an outstanding chin. Just not top bracket. I'm being very picky here, I know.
     
  7. Pat_Lowe

    Pat_Lowe Active Member Full Member

    1,194
    15
    Feb 26, 2006
    Understood. Top bracket consists of fighters like Hagler, LaMotta, Chuvalo, McCullogh, McCall? Fighters who were never floored? I would probably agree though that Hamed P4P hit harder then Rosario.
     
  8. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,774
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    Of course it's fair if we are talking about the ability to take shots. It affords us comparative ability.

    I am not alone in confusing the argument. Determining "best chins" is a complicated matter and the more variables you factor in, the more confused it gets. Any argument that gets hypothetical here shouldn't be offered (ex. Hagler against a LHW) because it can go on forever.

    If we simplify the argument by setting parameters, it would help. We should look at what was and resist hypothesizing.

    1. Stoppage losses count, if it is the result of head trauma from punches, not for a dislocated shoulder.
    2. Some leeway should be giving for the fighter who over ~35. By the same measure, the fighter who takes monster shots over 35 should get recognition.
    3. A fighter was out of shape and got hurt, stopped or knocked down? It should count against him.
    4. A fighter chose to rise in weight and fight a banger and gets hurt, stopped or knocked down? It should count against him.

    Other variables to consider is how many bangers faced, shots landing flush, and the reaction when big shots from big punchers landed flush.

    Sweet Scientist's assertion that being hurt but not going down should be considered sensibly is well-taken...
     
  9. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,774
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    If Chavez never went down in 90 fights, we would say he had a legendary chin. And there would be evidence to prove it, namely, that he never went down in 90 fights, and he fought a fair amount of good punchers -Rosario at the top of them.

    To then second guess his standing by saying, "well, De La Hoya would have stopped him had they fought" would be balderdash.
     
  10. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,774
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    Marvin's chin withstood
    flush
    shots
    from
    Hearns'
    Right (uppercut and a cross) when
    Hearns was fresh
    and in his physical prime at 26 years old.

    --If Hagler had one fight in his total career and accomplished that feat, it should still give you pause.

    He also took shots from Mugabi -right on the sniffer and right on the kisser. Repeatedly. Nothing happened. His head steamed and he walked right on in. Throw in guys like Roldan, Lee, and Briscoe and Cyclone Hart who was murderous and you have to think this through.

    Not many guys took shots better than heavier punchers.

    I think he's earned the benefit of the doubt with hypotheticals.
     
  11. Raging B(_)LL

    Raging B(_)LL KAPOW!!! Full Member

    2,675
    47
    Jul 19, 2004
    Marcos Villasana and Juan LaPorte deserve honourable mentions when discussing all-time great chins. I cannot recall ever seeing either man truly hurt or dropped by a single punch, and I have seen these two eat some absolute bombs over the years. Eder Jofre and Salvador Sanchez come to mind as well, both men had outstanding chins.
     
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,824
    44,505
    Apr 27, 2005
    Fantastic additions. LaPorte given his resume is definitely on the level of Hagler and co.
     
  13. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006
    Billy Miske would be also a good choice IMO...