Best clincher you've ever seen?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lopetego, Jan 16, 2015.


  1. Lopetego

    Lopetego Guest

    because holding effectively is also a skill


    Who's that master clincher who can neutralize any offense from any possible angle, at any given moment if allowed to?
     
  2. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,385
    3,796
    Feb 20, 2008
    Jack Johnson, John Ruiz, Lennox Lewis
     
  3. MN_Logan

    MN_Logan Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,513
    2
    Sep 26, 2014
    Wladimir Clinchko and Ali clinched every two seconds, they also got away with holding behind the head and neck their whole careers.
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,565
    83,428
    Nov 30, 2006
    Not Ruiz, no. He didn't clinch effectively. His clinching yielded him no strategic advantage. It was pure fight-stalling, because he didn't like to (couldn't) fight three minutes of every round with top class opponents.

    Now, someone like Ricky Hatton on the other hand, used clinching very intelligently as one pivotal component of his style.
     
  5. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,757
    4,495
    Jul 14, 2009
    :good
     
  6. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,043
    Oct 13, 2010
    A skill. Yeah i suppose it is. But not when you abuse it and stink out the joint
     
  7. Lopetego

    Lopetego Guest

    He failed to neutralize a bloated LHW :oops:
     
  8. FloatingGhost

    FloatingGhost Some guy Full Member

    2,051
    459
    May 16, 2012
    Holding is a damn foul. Call it a skill if u want. It's only viewed as such by morons who just have to defend their favorite fighters who can't win without constant holding. Ward and klitchko are the current worst offenders.
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,565
    83,428
    Nov 30, 2006
    Actually the answer is a little more nuanced. Excessive holding is a foul, not a skill. However, a brief tie-up here and there when hurt or after jumping in to land a sequence, used sparingly, is just one tool in a boxer's kit.
     
  10. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,796
    10,060
    Jan 27, 2014
    Khan may not be the best but he clinches more than any other boxer I have seen recently.
     
  11. FloatingGhost

    FloatingGhost Some guy Full Member

    2,051
    459
    May 16, 2012
    When using holding as part of your strategy to win a fight it is excessive. When hurt, fine. Tie up. Survive. Make him expend energy. But to jab, cross n grab ala andre ward or wlad...that's a foul. If you can't box well enough to get your shots off n maintain an effective defense without holding then you are getting way more credit as a boxer than u should.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,565
    83,428
    Nov 30, 2006
    It depends on the extent to which it gets used. The rules forbid excessive holding. That means doing nothing but. Jab-and-grab in moderation is okay, if you're mixing it up and not just being cheap (like someone in a video game spamming the same move)
     
  13. Mr. Iron Chin

    Mr. Iron Chin Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,549
    46
    Sep 3, 2012
  14. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
    Abril

    He won't let go