It isn't bad. People let all that five title nonsense get in the way of what was a really impressive win and perfomance.
you call this cherrypicking : fighting Wilfred Benitez who was {38 - 0 - 1} in only your 26th fight and in your first world title shot fighting Roberto Duran a all time great and who was {72 - 1} at the time, for only your 28th fight and in only your 2nd defence of the title then fighting a Top 3 all time great welterweight in {32 - 0} Tommy Hearns who was destroying everyone at the time and was considered the Pd 4 Pd number 1 by ring magzine at the time. and in 3 year time span is incrediable. that to me is one of the most impressive lists of opponents in boxing history. Sugar Ray Leonard was the real deal.
I don't like Leonard like I do other fighters. But I tend to face the facts on how great he was as a fighter.
Anyone know the odds on the Norris-Leonard fight before Terry took his head off? lalonde's a joke atsch :roll:
I had a Joe Frazier avatar as well. And trust me, I hate Joe Frazier as a fighter. And I don't always carry his picture around. I very seldom have a Leonard avatar. Recently, yes. Thats what you really can't grasp. Why people personally dislike a fighter but can give credit where it's due.
Pipino Cuevas who was WBA champion (175 - 1980) and had defended the title 10 times with 9 by ko, until Tommy destroyed him in 2 Rds Tommy made 4 defense 3 by ko until Leonard stopped him in one of the all time classic fights.
You're just talking one guy. It was Cuevas who made the defenses, not Tommy. Who's everyone? You cant just be talking about one guy. Name names for me. Anyone I might recognize?
perhaps i should of put it better the choice of when to fight hagler was what i meant by cherry picking
well you did'nt put it that way you said {that cherry picking ****** Leonard} which his record clearly shows he was'nt