Fair enough; as to the Leonard and Camacho cherry-picking and close decision debate, I would only answer that one need only to see the differences in the names on their ledgers to see why it's not really an apples-to-apples comparison.
What's the rationale for Gomez? Your picks are your picks, not trying to deride them, but it seems by far his best was encapsulated in the 70's.
I have no order, since it's all subjective. But Leonard, Hagler, Hearns, Tyson, Chavez, Holmes, Spinks, Holyfield, Pryor and Galaxy or Sanchez have to be in the lock for the top 10.
Well how about Ring as well? SRL fighter of the 80's. https://www.ringtv.com/121043-10-greatest-fighters-by-decade/
Just imagine how they would rate someone coming along and knocking Hagler off this pedestal. Oh wait, hang on!!!!
As we've been thru before the vast majority of boxing writers favored SRL and some by significant margins. Dave Anderson of the New York Times: 114-114 Associated Press: 117-112 Hagler Baltimore Sun: 7-5 in rounds Leonard Al Bernstein of ESPN: 115-113 Hagler Dave Bontempo of ESPN: 114-114 Boston Globe: 117-111 Leonard Boston Herald 116-113 Leonard Chicago Sun-Times: 115-114 Hagler Chicago Tribune: 7-5 in rounds Hagler Nigel Collins of The Ring: 115-113 Leonard Howard Cosell: 117-112 Leonard Houston Chronicle: 115-114 Leonard Michael Katz: 117-112 Leonard Harold Lederman of HBO: 115-113 Leonard Phill Marder of The Ring: 114-114 Larry Merchant of HBO: 114-114 New York Daily News: 117-111 Leonard New York Post: 114-114 Newsday: 115-114 Hagler Philadelphia Daily News: 116-112 Leonard Oakland Tribune: 117-112 Leonard Jeff Ryan of KO Magazine: 118-111 Leonard San Jose Mercury-News: 116-115 Hagler United Press International: 116-112 Leonard Washington Post: 114-114 He's in the debate for sure. I don't rate those wins with Leonard's tho.
Galaxy at no. 3 is a really interesting pick - I absolutely would have forgotten about him if you hadn't mentioned him. I think Chavez was a fantastic fighter but I think his most significant work was split between the late 80s and early 90s and his place in the 80s suffers a little for it. No argument with Hearns or Hagler being in the top 5 at all, but not sure how Hearns can rank three places above him considering Hagler KO'ed him in 3 in one of the biggest fights of the era. Hagler is no. 2 at worst in the 80s - the most dominant champion of the era. And Leonard should be much higher (but you already knew I'd say that)!
My top 10 of the 1980s 1. Marvin Hagler 2. Sugar Ray Leonard 3. Thomas Hearns 4. Mike Tyson 5. Michael Spinks 6. Julio Cesar Chavez 7. Larry Holmes 8. Salvador Sanchez 9. Azumah Nelson 10. Eusebio Pedroza Just missed out: -Aaron Pryor -Jeff Fenech -Khaosai Galaxy -Mike McCallum -Evander Holyfield
The 'names' that Leonard fought on his returns from retirement, from '87 to '89, included two, well past their best opponents. Their names don't really change the fact that Hagler was on the verge of retirement and never fought again, after their bout, or that Duran was 38; his heyday well behind him; never to be recaptured (not for the want of trying on Duran's part, mind). The point is that, big names or no, the context of any given bout is important in assessing its relative worth and contribution to an overall rating for the decade - this is particularly important, in Leonard's case, since he elected to sit out of the '80s, for a significant number of years.
I guess the problem I have with is that you are focusing just on that stretch of the 80's, rather ignoring wins over Duran, Hearns Hagler, and a real good win too over an unbeaten Kalule. I don't think you're really looking at the whole. Good discussion, by the way. Enjoying this.
not really since KO had been predicting his demise for years John, in all the years we've been debating, have you ever won a debate?