Best Fighters of the 1980's, 1-10

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by salsanchezfan, Jun 26, 2018.


  1. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,689
    9,869
    Jun 9, 2010
    Yes I was. I tipped Leonard to win.
     
  2. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004
    Fair enough; as to the Leonard and Camacho cherry-picking and close decision debate, I would only answer that one need only to see the differences in the names on their ledgers to see why it's not really an apples-to-apples comparison.
     
  3. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,689
    9,869
    Jun 9, 2010
    A knackered Boxer is a knackered Boxer, his name doesn't change that.
     
  4. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004
    I don't follow...……?
     
  5. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004

    What's the rationale for Gomez? Your picks are your picks, not trying to deride them, but it seems by far his best was encapsulated in the 70's.
     
  6. DirtyDan

    DirtyDan Worst Poster of 2015 Full Member

    10,701
    3,777
    Oct 30, 2011
    I have no order, since it's all subjective. But Leonard, Hagler, Hearns, Tyson, Chavez, Holmes, Spinks, Holyfield, Pryor and Galaxy or Sanchez have to be in the lock for the top 10.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,823
    44,501
    Apr 27, 2005
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,823
    44,501
    Apr 27, 2005
    Just imagine how they would rate someone coming along and knocking Hagler off this pedestal. Oh wait, hang on!!!! ;)
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,823
    44,501
    Apr 27, 2005
    As we've been thru before the vast majority of boxing writers favored SRL and some by significant margins.

    • Associated Press: 117-112 Hagler
    • Baltimore Sun: 7-5 in rounds Leonard
    • Boston Globe: 117-111 Leonard
    • Boston Herald 116-113 Leonard
    • Chicago Sun-Times: 115-114 Hagler
    • Chicago Tribune: 7-5 in rounds Hagler
    • Houston Chronicle: 115-114 Leonard
    • Phill Marder of The Ring: 114-114
    • New York Daily News: 117-111 Leonard
    • New York Post: 114-114
    • Newsday: 115-114 Hagler
    • Philadelphia Daily News: 116-112 Leonard
    • Oakland Tribune: 117-112 Leonard
    • San Jose Mercury-News: 116-115 Hagler
    • United Press International: 116-112 Leonard
    • Washington Post: 114-114

    He's in the debate for sure. I don't rate those wins with Leonard's tho.
     
  10. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,831
    13,125
    Oct 20, 2017
    Galaxy at no. 3 is a really interesting pick - I absolutely would have forgotten about him if you hadn't mentioned him.

    I think Chavez was a fantastic fighter but I think his most significant work was split between the late 80s and early 90s and his place in the 80s suffers a little for it.

    No argument with Hearns or Hagler being in the top 5 at all, but not sure how Hearns can rank three places above him considering Hagler KO'ed him in 3 in one of the biggest fights of the era. Hagler is no. 2 at worst in the 80s - the most dominant champion of the era.

    And Leonard should be much higher (but you already knew I'd say that)!
     
  11. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,831
    13,125
    Oct 20, 2017
    My top 10 of the 1980s

    1. Marvin Hagler
    2. Sugar Ray Leonard
    3. Thomas Hearns
    4. Mike Tyson
    5. Michael Spinks
    6. Julio Cesar Chavez
    7. Larry Holmes
    8. Salvador Sanchez
    9. Azumah Nelson
    10. Eusebio Pedroza

    Just missed out:
    -Aaron Pryor
    -Jeff Fenech
    -Khaosai Galaxy
    -Mike McCallum
    -Evander Holyfield
     
  12. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,689
    9,869
    Jun 9, 2010
    The 'names' that Leonard fought on his returns from retirement, from '87 to '89, included two, well past their best opponents. Their names don't really change the fact that Hagler was on the verge of retirement and never fought again, after their bout, or that Duran was 38; his heyday well behind him; never to be recaptured (not for the want of trying on Duran's part, mind).

    The point is that, big names or no, the context of any given bout is important in assessing its relative worth and contribution to an overall rating for the decade - this is particularly important, in Leonard's case, since he elected to sit out of the '80s, for a significant number of years.
     
  13. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004
    I guess the problem I have with is that you are focusing just on that stretch of the 80's, rather ignoring wins over Duran, Hearns Hagler, and a real good win too over an unbeaten Kalule. I don't think you're really looking at the whole.

    Good discussion, by the way. Enjoying this.
     
  14. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005



    According to an LA Times poll, looked pretty even
     
  15. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    not really since KO had been predicting his demise for years

    John, in all the years we've been debating, have you ever won a debate?