Best five wins thread. Lineal / Ring Magazine heavyweight champions.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, May 8, 2020.



  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,042
    24,051
    Feb 15, 2006
    Ferguson was discussed as a serious title challenger for Jeffries, and his resume was not good, because he was a bit of a child with money.

    Head to head, he was certainly one of the most dangerous men that Hart met.

    In the Johnson thread we will expand on him further.
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,101
    24,870
    Jun 2, 2006
    He wasn't a heavyweight,as we know the term today.
    Names bandied about here as best wins for fighters include Choynski for Corbett,five years after Corbett beat Choynski, Choynski still only weighed 162lbs when he fought Fitzsimmons
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2020
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,101
    24,870
    Jun 2, 2006
    He wasn't a heavyweight,as we know the term today.How can best wins for heavyweights include guys that were middleweights? Five years after Corbett beat Choynski,Choynski still only weighed 162lbs when he fought Fitzsimmons.
    Mitchell weighed 150lbs when he fought Sullivan. In his middle thirties ,when he fought Corbett he was 165lbs.These are middleweights. How many heavyweights did Corbett beat?How many over 175lbs did he actually fight?
     
    KasimirKid likes this.
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,264
    Jun 29, 2007
    We already went over Sullivan and Corbett. You were AWOL. I don’t think you have the exact weights. More like the reported weights which fighters understated back then.

    If Choynski was 165 pounds for Corbett and 170 pounds when he KO’d Johnson he was still a heavyweight back then.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,042
    24,051
    Feb 15, 2006
    I don't see that as being particularly important for a fighter of that period.
     
    Jason Thomas, Mendoza and 70sFan865 like this.
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,101
    24,870
    Jun 2, 2006
    I see it as being important when you are discussing a heavyweight champions best wins. McCoy,Choynski,McCaffrey,Mitchell were NOT heavyweights.If they have to be included this indicates a paucity of heavyweight scalps on a heavyweights record.
     
  7. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,458
    May 30, 2019
    They were heavyweights by contemporary criteria. By modern criteria most heavyweights before 1970s were not heavyweights.
     
    Mendoza likes this.
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,101
    24,870
    Jun 2, 2006
    A heavyweight as I understand it is a fighter who enters the ring at over 175lbs,ie the light heavyweight limit,and that goes back to long before the 70's.None of those I named did ,so for me they do not qualify.
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,042
    24,051
    Feb 15, 2006
    Yes they were.

    In those days a heavyweight was anybody over 154lbs, or 158lbs after Fitzsimmosn won the title.

    The fact that they were not heavyweights in today's terms, might have some relevance when comparing them to later champions, but it has none whatsoever when discussing their own best wins.
     
    Jason Thomas, Mendoza and 70sFan865 like this.
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,042
    24,051
    Feb 15, 2006
    The light heavyweight division did not exist before 1903.

    Before that the heavyweight division started at 158lbs, and before 1891 it was 154lbs.
     
    Mendoza and 70sFan865 like this.
  11. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,458
    May 30, 2019
    As janitor said, there was no LHW division back then, so anyone over MW was a heavyweight.

    Today heavyweight has to be over 200 lbs. Would you object from calling Jack Dempsey a heavyweight? Or Rocky Marciano? They were heavyweight by contemporary criteria, but not by 2010s criteria. Same applies to 1890s fighters.
     
    Webbiano and Mendoza like this.
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,264
    Jun 29, 2007
    ^^^ This. Besides the heavyweight division is unlimited and doesn't care about weight, even 40 years after 1900, we saw Billy at 168 pounds nearly upset Joe Louis.

    I say we get back to Hart's best 5 wins.
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2020
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,101
    24,870
    Jun 2, 2006
    Are you under the impression I don't know these stats?
     
  14. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,264
    Jun 29, 2007
    We are taking five best wins, not five best wins over a certain weight. Do you plan on voting or are you here to take a whizz on things?

    I'd like to see your votes, particular on Johnson and Dempsey who had their share of big wins vs opponents under 175 pounds. Burns at 168 pounds could be viewed as Johnson best win. Langford was 156 pounds ( He says in the 140's ) and very young, Carpentier at 172 pounds probably will make the cut for Dempsey. Are you going to growl about those fights too, OR is is this double standard strictly confined to Sullivan and Corbett?

    Like I said I actually want you to join in.. Why not use this opportunity of your 3rd lifted ban as a clean slate?
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,042
    24,051
    Feb 15, 2006
    Perhaps you didn't quite understand the point of the thread?

    We are trying to work out what each fighters best wins were.

    Whether or not their best five, was good compared to somebody else's, is not important at this stage.
     
    Jason Thomas, Mendoza and 70sFan865 like this.