Best Heavyweight P4P

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Big Lou dog, Jul 10, 2021.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Best Heavyweight P4P
     
    Finkel likes this.
  2. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,455
    2,973
    Mar 31, 2021
    You don't understand. My point wasn't about p4p, but that the normal sized version of Peter beats Langford.
    Truth be told, I also think that Peter will even win if we scale him down a bit.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,113
    25,276
    Jan 3, 2007
    Not bad picks. I’m wondering if Sam Langford should be in there
     
  4. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    That's because you don't know **** about boxing.
     
  5. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,455
    2,973
    Mar 31, 2021
    Size wise, perhaps. Skill wise, don't think so. I've said this about many old timers: great for their era, but would get beaten handily by latter champs.
     
  6. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,455
    2,973
    Mar 31, 2021
    No, that's because I don't look at things with rose tinted nostalgia glasses like you do.
     
  7. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    I don't either, I just see that Langford had far better defense, ability to set up punches and footwork. Peter has no advantage on Langford other than sheer size, but Langford beat Peter-sized fighters in his career who were good contenders anyway.

    Seriously, Langford had wins over ATG fighters when he was old, half-blind and overweighed. How did he accomplish that without more skills than Sam Peter?
     
  8. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,455
    2,973
    Mar 31, 2021
    Cause those ATGs are described as such due to what they achieved in their own era, they can't hold a candle to more modern ATGs.
     
  9. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    No, that's not the case. The best 1910s and 1920s fighters below HW division could compete in any era.

    By the way, I can't find more modern looking HW than George Godfrey - huge, massive, powerful puncher, limited offensive arsenal and inconsistent conditioning. I don't think Peter is any better than Godfrey and Langford knocked him out early.
     
  10. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,455
    2,973
    Mar 31, 2021
    No they couldn't, they'd get embarrassed bigtime.

    Peter is definitely better than Godfrey.
    They say a picture says 1000 words, I believe this highlights it better than anything:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Godfrey_(boxer,_born_1897)#/media/File:George_Godfrey_LOC.jpg
     
  11. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
  12. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    Please try to explain why you think these guys couldn't compete now (I'd recomend putting it to .75 speed)
    This content is protected
     
    70sFan865 and scandcb like this.
  13. scandcb

    scandcb Active Member Full Member

    1,029
    1,209
    Jun 9, 2020
    Didn't you earlier claim that Marciano was P4P the best heavyweight ever?
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  14. Samtotheg

    Samtotheg Active Member Full Member

    822
    398
    May 4, 2021
    I do not know if I consider this film or Gibbons vs Mcfarland , the most technical boxing match on youtube!!!!
     
  15. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,765
    16,797
    Jan 13, 2021
    No they wouldn't.