Best heavyweight title challenger of 2010

Chambers, and it isn't even debatable.

 

Damn... I might have to say Briggs.
Maybe Ruiz.

 

Chambers by 500 miles. He'd beat nearly every other heavy out there.

 

Ruiz.

 

Chambers would beat the rest of them, he's the best

 

looking at the list, george foreman must fancy his chances at a shot!!

 

****, what a terrible list on individual fighters. :-( They all lose.

 

This list sucks, but I think I would have to go with Briggs. :huh

 

No doubt it's chambers followed by Peter. Sosnowski, Briggs and Ruiz were/are poor. Harrison is laughable.

Dimitrenko/Chisora are below Peter but above the poor group.

 

Chambers.

 

i put sosnowski just for the fact that he showed up in shape and actually tried to win

 

Chambers by a country mile.. but it's true the list is pitiful. Chambers actually isn't a bad fighter, he just had no chance at all against the guy he was up against.

 

Chambers is the only one on the list that actually beat several top 10 fighters to earn his title shot. He also looked good against Povetkin before running out of steam. He's a good boxer/puncher and actually got himself into great shape for his title run, unforunately he was no match for Wlad.

 

chambers, by a mile. and he wasnt a **** poor title challenge at all.

he had beaten brock, peter and dmitrenko, plus had a close defeat to povetkin.

he was clearly one of the top rated challengers. and wlad beat him senseless.