Ali was probably the best defensive heavyweight the world has ever seen at the time he fought William's
I don't know shite about the lower divisions, and I admit that, you do know about the LHW division and yet you still refuse to rank him there Having Jofre in the top 5 is a mainstream thing to do, so me not having him there makes me the one who's normal by your own standards. Having Shane Mosley as the second greatest LW ever is a worse sin than any I've made on here
Charles best wins came at LHW, when he beat your own number 1 3 times. 5 people in your 40 LHWs list didn't win teh title at that weight, and they made the cut whilst not being half as accomplished there. Please oh dear lord tell me why Mickey Walker is there but Ezzard Charles isn't And Andre Ward is a career SMW who had 2 fights at LHW both of which are highly controversial. How is he there? I make the threads to learn about the divisions, the list is to show people what they're working with And ok yes. I may have made a mistake and said 2 instead of 3 but it doesn't matter this list is a ****ing shambles anyway Pipe down son
I have no reason to create other accounts and frankly I dont even know how to do that as computers and electronics arent in my line of work so keep dreaming genius. As far as educated maybe you are. You strike me as someone who is more book smart than real world smart. So keep patting yourself on the back and tell yourself how your the end all to be all in boxing expertise in your own mind
I know full well his résumé I Stan him, he had more losses at HW because that's where he spent the downside of his career Also loses at the weight should show he wasnt as good there Charles had 3 wins at HW that come close to Moore (none of which in a pfp sense) Louis, Walcott 1, Walcott 2 At LHW he has wins over Moore 3*, Bivins, Marshall, Ray, Maxim He clearly accomplished more at LHW even without winning the title (who he beat anyway) Well it's hard to get a title shot when the champ is in the army and when he comes back outright ducks you. He still aquired the best résumé of all time at 175 yet you can't even have him in the top 40. Walker is a small middleweight/big welterweight, his best win is at WW and has more losses in 175 title fights than wins. He is NOT worthy of placement above Charles. Well then you should go right back to the drawing board for 175 and 135 son That's ridiculous. They have a better résumés than Ward does and it's not even close Still leagues below anything I've posted. And something to think about "He who sees everyone as insane is usually the one without sanity" I have 3 times the likes as you with 4 times less posts. Your opinions as strange as they may be are not always right, just like my own. I seem to hit the mark often. Son just stop.
No I am not. He was facing similar competition at both weights, but he rematched the ones at LHW more. No, Chris Byrd didn't achieve 3% of what Charles did at lower weights. That's a lost of ATGs and we both know it. What do you mean Walker had high profile fights at HW? Like Charles didn't! He was avoided by him in the war years, it was only when he lost he fought Charles as a HW for a much bigger pay. I do make sense you just can't read. I said called you my son and said you need to go back to the drawing board for the 175 and 135lbs divisions