Best light heavyweight title reigns

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Apr 18, 2016.


  1. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,472
    12,944
    Mar 2, 2006
    We can paint a bit of rhetoric on anything here, butI'm strictly commenting on the subject of greatest title reign. Galindez defended his title 11 times and fought 9 non-titles while champ. Spinks sat on his title after the Davis fight for a year and Davis didn't lose to Johnson for 14 months after the Spinks fight. Ample time for Michael to put it on the line. But who did he fight? The absolutely hopeliess David Sears and Jim McDonald instead of Davis. By definistion, not the greatest reign.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    Galindez was never lineal champ imo.
     
  3. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,472
    12,944
    Mar 2, 2006
    Maybe not, but he definitely put those lineal title reigns to shame.
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    It's so hard because quite often the champ wasn't the best around.

    Was Conteh better than Galindez?
    Was DM better than Jones?
    Was Erdei better than Tarver, Hopkins or Joe?
    Was Lesnevic better than Charles etc.

    Almost all the long reigns are somewhat tainted.

    It's gotta be between Spinks and Foster for me.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,677
    27,391
    Feb 15, 2006
    Yes but I am asking you to rank the reigns themselves, not the fighters.

    Who had the most impressive tenures as lineal light heavyweight champions?
     
  7. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,524
    5,332
    Jan 19, 2016
    Ditto virgil Hill
     
  8. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,524
    5,332
    Jan 19, 2016
    Good points
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    Between Spinks and Foster.
     
  10. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,846
    6,625
    Dec 10, 2014
    Galindez did fight some very good opposition as champion, but several of his defenses were razor close and/or controversial.
     
  11. thefactor

    thefactor Member Full Member

    202
    37
    Mar 20, 2016
    I'm not sure if he had the best LH reign but like you say he was pure class. Boxing skill, distance, timing and movement were something others fighters could learn a lot from him. I feel he never got the recognition he deserved and is one of the most underrated boxers in history. I met him in Russia a few years ago and told him all these things.
     
  12. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,801
    2,619
    Oct 18, 2004
    Tommy Loughran, Archie Moore, Bob Foster, Victor Galindez, and Michael Spinks. All in all, Moore probably edges this.
     
  13. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,794
    8,332
    Feb 11, 2005
    By definition, those 9 non-title fights don't count toward a title reign. Just saying. And if Sears and McDonald weren't stellar contenders, the same could be said for Skog and Smith.

    In all, I think Spinks' reign might be a little better based on dominance exerted against a similar level of contender.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,852
    29,305
    Jun 2, 2006
    Maske? He might come to your mind,I very much doubt he is on anyone else's radar.:-(
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,852
    29,305
    Jun 2, 2006
    It was a golden era for 175pounders imo.
    He and Conteh would have been a real war!