:good:goodbloody brilliant !! is he britains best ever ?? could well be !! cheers mcgrain .you know quality when you see it :hi:
I don't see him beating a prime Ortiz, but Buchannan for me is one of the best lightweights ever. There is a possibility he has a good one with Williams, who knows.
Bold post, but possible, very underrated champ I'd pick Buchanan over Julio Chavez, Castillo, Ambers and give him a good shot at Henry Armstrong and Ross
Wow after watching that Video I think I have been underrating Buchanon. The man had some serious skills.
Given the oft mentioned opinion that roberto didnt go too well against movers,what does a 21 year old beating kenny mean in regards to this opinion? Or would we not consider kenny a 'mover'?
:good Agree on all but Ross. I favour him over Armstrong, yes indeed. I'm not sure there was a better one two in the sport, Q, when he was at his best. He was patchy though, took a while to peak and then fell of reasonably quickly. But when he was at his own personal summit, I think he was great.
Duran didn't really struggle against movers per se.It was just when he fought fighters far more concrned with surviving, minimising exchanges and generally staying out of range he tended t somewhat phone in his performance somewhat if they weren't ofering much offensively. the fight with Buchanan was an earlier Duran with somethign to prove and at his most aggressive.BUchanan was a far superior pure boxer and multidirectional mover to Bizarro, fernandez and co...just nowhere near as negative.
Maybe Chavez among modern counterparts. A bout with Ross would've been fantastic. I definitely do not favor him over Armstrong though, given how a young, swarming Duran handled him.
Yes.he moved around the ring beautifully.Great multi-directional mobility and variety in his footwork.