He didnt say that. Whitaker tried not to get hit, but he took more risks in terms of oponents than Floyd, :good
Who cares? Fighters of today will never reach the stage of the past greats. It's impossible. The division will never be great or deep enough, thus always lacking quality. Fighters of the past are held so high up on a pedestal that todays fighter's shouldn't even think they can reach it.
Another interesting list with justifiable names, but Ali over Armstrong is not defendable in my view. Care to comment?
Not true. Whitaker and Jones have been mentioned in that incredible group of fighters before. As a matter of fact, many have gone on record as saying that if Mayweather unified the division he is in RIGHT NOW, he would be in the discussion with those fighters. So this isn't the truth at all, just a matter of your perception without actually paying attention to what the posters here are saying. When they DO say things like this, Mayweathers fans are the first to say he doesn't need this fighter or this fighter won't fight him. So it's not people claiming there isn't the talent in his division or around him to be in the conversation.....in fact, it's his fans saying he doesn't need these guys THEN making the statement you just made that is a bit puzzling.
I wasn't even talking Mayweather I was talking all fighters. Fighters of today will never reach top 10 P4P all time. EVER. Won't happen.
My list fluctuates. But on an ATG list, it is as follows. 1. Armstrong 2. Robinson 3. Greb 4. Pep 5. Ali 6. Duran 7. R. Leonard 8. B. Leonard 9. Charles 10. Whitaker
Ali being a HW fought all that he could. He beat 3 top 10 HW's, he showed all the qualities that a great champion does. He had it all minus proper KO power; footwork, balence, speed, timing, chin, infighting ability and a ton of heart. He could not hope to achive the titles that Armstrong did in a number of weight class's (the most impressive thing that a boxer has done imo) simply because he was a HW. He fought and beat all he could. I would not have said that it was undefendable that Ali was over Armstrong, I would also not argue Armstrong being above Ali.
Whitaker is on my list. Mayweather unifying today would put him on that list for me. Or even beating Cotto then Forrest would get him near it if he did it convincingly. Jones would have been there if he had beaten either Benn or Collins, along with Nunn and DM. Hopkins will be damn close if he beats Calzaghe at this stage. There are fighters capable of making it. IF THEY FIGHT THE BEST and stop talking about risk/reward more than actual wins.
I think it's possible that the further back you go the more general toughness is rewarded. In a very general sense.
GUY starts his career at 154, 8 fights or something, loses because of weight, steps up to Middle. Unifies the MW title defends 8 times, 8 KO's including a second victory over the incumbant MW champ who many considered an ATG. Moves up to SMW, cleans out the division in 9 fights, ducks no-one, doesn't unify the belts because of politics but the one holding out is the WBA Eurostar. 175. Meets the p4p #2 in a series of 3, wins two of them. Cruiser. Now fighting noticeably bigger men. Unifies the belts, three defences in a deep division. Perhaps would be criticised for not taking more defences but is moving up to Heavy - Where he goes 4-2 and becomes two time HW champ of the world. Drops back down to 175 for a massive money fight, wins it but looks old, now the two time 175 champ. Retires. Something like that would do it.
These kind of arguments are dumb as **** and so contextually bias that there is no point in discussing them! There are boxers that none of us can name that have done more than a lot of boxers we consider great.... There are greats for each time period...
I think i had him at 10 last time, so I do think he is in the p4p argument but this is far to high. HW's are crippled in the p4p argument because they can't be triple crown winning monsters who fight some of the best fighters in 3 weight divisions over the course of 10 years at the top - like Armstrong. The essential difference between the two - it's posible to hav Ali in your top 5, but you need a strong case. It's almost impossible to have Armstrong outside your top 5.