So if I play tennis with Federer.. and he strains his ancle..... then I am better than Roger Federer at tennis? Wow - that is an alternative way of looking at the world.
You can't use tennis as an example. If the guy gets cut and then the other guy takes advantage and makes the cut worse and that ends the fight then yeah, that's a loss. Besides wasn't Lennox Lewis like 37 at that point?
Haye better fighter Wlad if he wants a chance at beating a Klitschko. Your scenario is good for boxing but its not plausible.
bro even if Fededer broke both his legs you would still lose 6-0 6-0 but I agree with you that Lewis vs Vitali did not prove that Lewis was better than Vitali, but their overall careers do.
Oh, who cares. Haye fights the Adamek-Arreola winner, and the winner of that fights a Klitschko. The HW division is pointless.