Best résumé of the "unbeaten world champs with 20 bouts or less" club?

Hot take (originally posted in the Horn vs. Crawford poll thread):

...if he snatches the highly regarded Crawford's zero within a year of defeating Pacquiao, the résumé of Jeff Horn will officially be the best of the "World champs with 20 pro bouts or less" Club (other members include 15-0 Naoya Inoue, 14-0 Oleksandr Usyk, 13-0 Dmitry Bivol, 19-0 Isaac Dogboe, 20-0 Gervonta Davis, 19-0 Alberto Machado, 17-0 Thammanoon Niyomtrong, 19-0 Ryan Burnett and 12-0 Ken Shiro**) - even if some of them win their upcoming high-profile bouts, ie Usyk in the WBSS final.

** Tanaka has been stripped and Gvozdyk is only interim champ. Lomachenko is excluded from consideration due the loss to Salido (but even so, Horn would have a superior overall professional résumé if he defeats Crawford, even if Lomachenko were to also defeat Linares)

 

Usyk if he gets by Gassiev will temporarily be #2, but of course will soon drop from the rankings altogether when he vacates his unified cruiser belts and moves up to HW (and is thus no longer a sitting champ).

After that it will be Horn followed by Inoue, then a sizable drop-off before the rest. (as much as I like, say, Bivol, his résumé doesn't yet match that of a Monster Inoue, let alone having the names Pacquiao and Crawford on it)

 

Inoue's current résumé plus McDonnell is wonderful, especially for only having 16 professional contests - but does it trump having Pacman and Crawdaddy?

 

To be clear: I don't mean right now. I mean pending the outcomes in everybody's (from the list/poll) upcoming fights, assuming they all win.

 

I'm guessing the people unwilling to entertain the idea of Horn being the clear pack leader here are those who believe he got a gift over Pacquiao...and/or the kind of vermin that'll chat up how Crawford is going to destroy him and then do a 180 and claim that Bud was never any good if he loses.