Best resume in boxing atm?

8-4 Gonzalez on each.

 

First of all, that's wrong. Both were 7-5 to the men who won, and secondly, having it 8-4 in fights where rounds were on a knife edge, isn't a robbery.

 

The rounds weren't on a knife edge. They were easy to score lopsided decisions for Gonzalez.

This content is protected

That's 102 people who agree with me the fight should have gone to Gonzalez.

 

Rung beat Gonzalez twice.only controversial fight was the first.

 

He beat him once with a knockout. The first fight was one of the greatest robberies in boxing history. Really shocking stuff.

 

No it isn't.

It's the average score from 102 people, and doesn't even equal 116-112, it's closer to 115-113. Do you think I give a **** what 100 idiots say?

Furthermore, it clearly shows that these 102 people were split between most rounds. This link you've posted does nothing but prove the rounds obviously were on a knife edge. Hence why they're controversial. The world isn't out to get Gonzalez. People want to see him win. But he didn't.

Gonzalez lost, to both Estrada and Rungvisai.

 

i thought Gonzalez won slightly but it was no robbery. @CST80

 

Estrada and choco shouldnt be said in the same breath as Canelo and Usyk when it comes to resumes.

 

If you read the numbers, you'll see that the only round that people were near evenly split on was the eleventh, which is the only round my card differed from the average. All of the other eleven rounds show a clear preference among the scores. What it proves is that the rounds were clear and not knife edge affairs and that the correct score was probably 115-113 Gonzalez.

I think if you were humble you would care what the majority of fans thought, but I don't think you are humble enough to consider you may be wrong. Most people don't change their minds when shown how unpopular their opinions are. The tendency is to dig in deeper. It's easier to dismiss the opinions of others even a lot of others as the opinions of idiots, which is why some people still think that Canelo beat GGG. It's a slim ten or twelve percent but they exist.

 

@CST80 had Wilder up two points at the time of the stoppage last week.

 

Im just bringing him up becuz he predicted a rungvisai win both times. Where i picked Gonxalez. HE HAD THE INSIGHT.

 

He had no insight. He hates Gonzalez and picks against him the same way he always does with Joshua.

 

Doesnt matter he still offers insight on the fight. I had fury dominating wilder in the 3rd and gonzalez beating rungvissi in the 1st fight, but still. @CST80 called it.

 

Usyk imo; Thabiso Mchunu,Michael Hunter,Tony Bellew,Derek Chisora and at last AJ,and all of the other people that he faced were not bad

Canelo is also good but I think Usyk holds up better..

 

Usyk has the better resume and is the better fighter.

Canelo isn't all that really.