Best Resume?

Jus goin on names alone I think Cotto is building up a pretty solid resume...

I had no idea Oscar's was that stacked...Damn!

 

Glen Johnson, there's no comparison.

 

To me De la Hoya is alone but if Hopkins faces Dawson, they will be almost compareable.

It's funny when people says because the golden boy had some losses, his resume suffers. I rather see couple losses on a resume to a resume full of ''if''.

There's no ''if'' with De la Hoya, if faced every possible match up down here.

No one beat De la hoya's ass in his whole career even with those names on his resume. (many of them was on their prime too) He had a chance to win every single fights maybe except Hopkins, although even the way bigger Hopkins lost several rounds to the goldenboy.

The goldenboy is a true ATG

 

Berto could have a great resume, not his fault everyone ducks him.

 

yeah

 

Oscar
Holyfield
Barrera
Morales
Lewis
Gatti
Pacman

 

Why would anyone duck Berto? Collazo IMO beat him for ****s sake. He would be an easy fight for any A rated fighter.

 

Cotto has fought a lot of good fighters, lot's of risky fights too, fights where most fighters think "Errrr.....better not"

 

Laters:hi:

 

When I consider resumes I consider the win-loss record against top level prime oppisition . to be the most important factor.
Since 1991 the two best resumes belong in my opinion to Prenell Whitaker and Floyd Mayweather Jr.

 

Pacquiao takes it if we go by this.

But overall, Oscar takes it.

 

Oscar fought EVERYONE, even people he didn't have to. The only ones missing are Winky who we all know priced himself out because he's a ****ing idiot, and Vernon Forrest only came into Oscar's radar after beating Mosley and by then Oscar was a 154 lber.

 

So if a near-top level fighter feasted on tomatoe cans and was 100 and 0 you would say they had a beter resume than a guy like DLH?

 

Of course you do :rofl

 

tell us something we don't know :yep