Best Threat to Wlad?

:deal

I think we all know the answer...

 

Stick wlad in the mid 90's and his resume would be even better IMO

 

Joshua? Wilder? Only two possibilities, who admittedly haven't been tested yet. Possibly add Fury to that, but having seen him on his **** against cruiserweights I very much doubt it.

 

David Haye without the broken toe

 

Wilder/Stiverne winner.

 

He is the only world class heavyweight in a poor era, made look more dominant what he really should be. To me Haye is the only one who had the ability to challenge him, only turning in a pathetic safety first performance. Fury has very little chance.

 

ah poor haye. hes a mug.

 

but corrie was prime back then. he'd flatten hwlad in 1 round...and then they'd both go on to never win anything.

 

His continued blatant steroid abuse

 

nope just stating fact - if wlad gets wiped out in 2 by old corrie, then prime corrie does it twice as fast - meaning wlad never gets into contention for a title. and corrie never did too.


its not about wish, its perfectly good logic.

You are the one wishing it wouldn't be that way, since yu have no logic to argue that wald gets past corrie.

 

you need to get laid herol geek

 

there are much better versions of corrie than the one who absolutely wiped out wlad in seconds.

You invent your fictional wlad, I'll stick with the facts.

you sayin?

 

as muchn as you need to get it right.

 

Prime wlad smashes corrie to pieces , its as simple as that (tone told me that)

 

ah good ol wooda coulda shoulda, meanwhile prime years wlad says hi -

[url]http://www.ksta.de/image/view/2003/2/9/14281898,10105444,dmData,Wladimir+Klitschko+am+Boden+%25281046797439158%2529.jpg[/url]