Best version Rahman vs. Best Version of Charles & Walcott

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KuRuPT, Dec 31, 2017.


  1. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,464
    2,824
    Aug 26, 2011
    Would these smaller but excellent HW's beat the bigger stronger fighter?
     
  2. Sting like a bean

    Sting like a bean Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,047
    1,597
    Apr 9, 2017
    I think Walcott and Charles both make him look oafish. I think you really have to be convinced that power is the cardinal asset, and to have fallen hook line and sinker for the notion that there was any good reason to create the cruiserweight division, to favor Rahmen here.
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2017
  3. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,974
    13,343
    Apr 1, 2007
    Rahman is stiff, lumbering, predictable, a fighter you can obviously tell at first glance picked up the sport late.

    I'd imagine both Charles and Walcott would be sizeable favorites over Rahman. Rahman hardly has the speed of foot to do much about them if they choose to box, and quite frankly I imagine both possess the power to badly ding if not outright stop Rahman... So what exactly was the point of this thread again...?