Best way to end purse disputes

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Akxtinguish, Nov 20, 2009.


  1. Akxtinguish

    Akxtinguish Belt holder Full Member

    3,659
    1
    Dec 6, 2007
    Bernard Hopkins on making his fight with RJJ:

    Why don't Pacman and Pretty Girl do the same?
     
  2. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    IMO, That's a good idea. It will probably harder for Mayweather to accept those terms because of his huge ego!
     
  3. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    60/40 with the higher percentage going to the winner is how fights SHOULD get made. It only makes sense that the winner should get a little more. Obviously it would suck even worse when robberies occur, however.
     
  4. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    Why not do it? Because it makes sense. Sports don't work that way unfortunately.
     
  5. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,391
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    The current system makes perfect sense.... as long as you remember that fighters are paid 1 fight in arears.

    If you take a title shot for peanuts and win you will get paid for that win in your next fight.