Wlad has been more dominant. Pac went life and death with Marquez, won titles at catchweights, and gets hit a lot more often.
They are both greats. While Wlad has been more dominant, Pac has faced better competition. There is no one on Wlad's resume that could be the equivalent of Marquez. Tough call.
Bull**** thread. Pacman has been more dominant and fought better opposition. I know he just got knocked the fk out but that doesnt dismiss all his accomplishments. If he had lost to a journeyman, it would be a different story. He lost to not only and Mexican ATG but to a boxing ATG... mthrfkn bullsht ESB has become.
What's all this bull**** about Wlad being more dominant? dominant against who? Pacquiao had a stretch of dominance stretching an odd 7 years defeating multiple ATG's and beating the likes of Hatton, Cotto, Margarito while Wlad's dominance is made up of wins over the likes of Marius Whack and Jean Marc Mormeck :blood:dead:dead
Pacquiao and its not even close. Wladimir is a great H2H heavyweight, but his resume is laughable next to Pacquiao's. Wladimir lost fights to Brewster and Sanders in the 2000s - far worse than losing to somebody on Juan Manuel Marquez and Erik Morales's level.