Better Comp? Hopkins or RJJ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ayatollah, Dec 20, 2007.


  1. Mankind

    Mankind Super Moderator banned

    1,417
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
  2. JediPimp007

    JediPimp007 Long suffering reader Full Member

    1,830
    552
    May 8, 2006
    totally agree, great post man :good
     
  3. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    RJJ by a country mile, anybody that thinks otherwise is a clear spastic

    Hopkins has fought midgets all his career. Trinidad, De La Hoya, Wright, pretty much all of his best wins. When he eventually fought fighters on an even playing field in that respect, he got his arse handed to him by the aforementioned RJJ, and got beat by a very very average fighter in Taylor

    A win against Antonio ****ing Tarver hardly pulls it back

    Needs Joe Calzaghe
     
  4. Viking Worrier

    Viking Worrier very worried viking Full Member

    172
    0
    Aug 22, 2007
    Clearly Jones.

    Some of you guys are way too influenced by the last few years in these two boxers careers.
     
  5. ssabripo

    ssabripo Active Member Full Member

    577
    1
    Apr 24, 2006
    :happy

    /thread
     
  6. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Roy Jones Jr.

    And to the guy compairing beating Virgil Hill at 175 to beating De La Hoya at 160? What are you thinking?

    Oscar did not even beat Strum, and was a poor middleweight!
     
  7. Weber

    Weber Active Member Full Member

    650
    0
    Jun 6, 2007
    This is ****ing ridiculous. Jones is a top 10 ATG, Bernard would be lucky to get into top 50. Just because Jones beat his opposition easily, it doesn't mean that his opposition wasn't good/great.
     
  8. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    You have to rate the fighter's ability relative to their weight class, not just the name, when rating competition. Obviously you would need to consider DLH was fighting at a weight class where he had proven nothing.
     
  9. Shaolin Box

    Shaolin Box Respect Full Member

    4,030
    3
    Nov 30, 2007
    :good Nice Avator!
     
  10. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Thanks:thumbsup
     
  11. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Ok, no reason to quote smaller. They were certainly smaller. And it doesn't matter whether he was the underdog. That's simply because he wasn't well known, which has little to do with how good a fighter he is.

    If you are rating the competition, you rate how good the fighter is at the time they fought them. Why add in other variables which have nothing to do with the fighters actual in ring ability. Jones wins the contest, and its not by a slim margin, nor by a wide one. He has fought overall better fighters, just not overall bigger names.
     
  12. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
  13. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I'll try and do this one , how I see it . My method will be to analyze the best (names) wins on each fighter's record

    Hopkins

    Winky Wright - not a top class win (Winky hadnt had a significnt wiin for ages and souldnt be fighting at that weight , but Hopkins' tactics were great)

    Antonio Tarver - top class win at the time (moved up and beat 175 champ)

    Jermaine Taylor - I thought B-Hop won the first one, but I wont let this hold much water as I said I would only count wins on the record and I understand a lot of people think Taylor deservd it

    Howard Eastman - a good win against a good fighter who deserved a titleshot

    Oscar DeLaHoya - this depends on the Sturm fight , i didnt watch it , but if Oscar deservd the win then this means he was a legit matchup at 160 for Hopkins , if Sturm was robbd then this win shouldnt mean 2 much

    William Joppy - a good win

    Felix Trinidad - Tito not in his best prime, but still a top win because of Trinidad's beating of Joppy @160

    Syd Vanderpool, Simon Brown and Antwun Echols - all decent wins but not great because 160 not their best weights

    Glen Johnson - better than the 3 above wins but not great for the same reason

    Roy Jones jr.

    Antonio Tarver - top class win (I think he won the first one because Tarver just tried to steal a lot of rounds late , but Jones was controling the rest of the rounds with the jab and footwork )

    John Ruiz - a top class win , not because of the oponent (I actualy rated him for effectiveness ) but more of what he acomplished by the weight jump.

    Clinton Woods - a good win (thats being very generous)

    Julio Gonzales - a good win

    Reggie Johnson - a decent win

    Virgil Hill - good win at the time

    Montell Griffin - good win

    Mike McCallum - well past his prime

    Vinny Pazienza - not good

    James Toney - top class win

    Bernard Hopkins - top class win

    So, I think Jones has the better resume
     
  14. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    I don't think it's generous to call the Woods win good, especially if the Gonzalez win was good. Woods has beaten Gonzalez 2 times and is a champion currently.

    As for the DLH-Sturm fight. If you posted a poll here, 75% would say DLH lost that fight by at least 2 rounds, maybe more. It was that bad of a robbery. He was outlanded, outpunched, out everything.
     
  15. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    After re-watching Hopkins-Taylor 1 and seeing him buzzed by a Taylor right hand, it's changed my perspective on Hopkins' chin a little. I think he absolutely can be KD'd if penetrated and a prime Toney would penetrate him.