Better defense: Mike Tyson or Roberto Duran

Tyson's defense was manufactured and well-instilled by D'Amato's traditional teaching methods but once he aged, his defensive skill went down the drain. Rarely has a man known for defensive prowess (for an aggressor) turned so porous defensively. As for Duran, his defensive instincts stayed with him even up to his late 30's. I think he was more talented and complete as well as proven at what he did.

 

Durans

 

...Duran Duran.

 

Although I liked both defences better Tyson's seemed very programmed in whereas Durans was pure natural instinct. Duran also had more manipulative defence which induced mistakes in his opponents than Tyson.

 

yawn

 

nah when I said Durans I meant as in Durans defence

get me homes?

I just think Durans defence was flat out better than Tysons, Tyson is one of the best at using good defense on the offensive though, brilliant.

 

is it an omission of an apostrophe though? You might be right and are gunna expose me major time here but I thought it would be;

Durans defence

and not;

Duran's defence

is it not? The latter looks like I' saying 'Duran is defence', as in 'Duran's good', i.e 'Duran is good'

or am I talking out my sheeeeezer?

 

is this the part where the sexual tension becomes too much to bear and you guys FINALLY make out?

 

thank **** you included that emoticon, i wouldn't have had any idea where you were going with that:huh....:think....:admin

 

hahahahaha

**** you though Jorodz

 

This content is protected

 

when I make a spelling mistake it means I get questioned on esb

this is what happens when Jorodz the ****** spells his name wrong

This content is protected

what a clown

 

Weird day in Classic.

 

haha guess the honeymoon's over

This content is protected