Better defense Whitaker or Mayweather

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by devon, Aug 11, 2012.


  1. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    :lol:

    No, it's just beneficial to all other things professional athlete (and males in general). It was a genuinely funny reaction, especially when he's friends with Don Hale who owns a couple dozen TRT clinics across the country. Why play stupid? Priceless stuff. In all honesty, I couldn't really give a **** less considering the competition is likely doing the same anyway. Floyd's getting old, and there still isn't a fighter his size on the planet who could beat him. He'd likely be favored over anybody 154 and down right now... And that's testament to skills -- some would cite '**** era', but still. I love the mother****er and would make plans to watch him school a Peter McNeeley level opponent.

    I like it. :deal

    Great post overall, too. Don't think anybody worthy went without mention.
     
  2. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    547
    Feb 17, 2010
    For technique in defence oriented stylists At or near best, not taking into account bad trainings habits, mental weakness\enormous egomania etc that can be factored into an overall assessment of the fighter

    This is probably the definitive post-pep list and should be stickied for future reference.:yep

    Locche
    Zapata
    Pea
    Duran
    Benitez
    Lora
    Kalambay
    Canto
    Starling
    Toney
    Benton


    Mayweather
    Hopkins(from circa Echols on)
    Wright(once he developed his glove defence)

    I know Duran shouldn't really be there stylistically speaking, but he's such a freak it had to be done.

    Boxer-punchers who had lots of defensive chops at one point or another in their career and can be added somewhere to 2nd tier list without fear of outright ridicule.in no particular order

    Archie Moore
    Ezzard Charles
    Charley Burley(might be even higher but only one fight available)

    in fact most of the great boxer punchers of the 40-60s can be added here.

    Eder Jofre
    Jose Napoles
    Emile Griffith
    Luis Rodriguez
    Carlos Ortiz
    Wilfredo Gomez
    Ismael Laguna
    Ken Buchanan
    Ernesto Marcel
    Johnny Famechon
    Lionel Rose
    Dwight Qawi
    victor Galindez
    Ali
    Michael Nunn
    Santos Laciar
    Esteban Dejesus
    Ayub Kalule
    Sugar Ray Leonard
    Marvin Hagler
    Jung-Koo Chang
    Michael Spinks
    Hugo Corro:yep
    Mike McCallum
    Salvador Sanchez
    Julio Cesar Chavez
    John Conteh
    Roy Jones jr.
    Chris Eubank
    Mark Johnson

    Then the amount of fighters with very good defensive capability while fighting in a varied non-safety first manner drops off considerably over the past 15 years.PLenty of strong talent in other areas, but i think a substantial amount of that period's best boxer-punchers(outside heavy where great defence was rare or traditionally not needed as much as durability and power) have been notably ordinary or flawed defensively and often had issues integrating a seamless slip and counter game.


    Tito
    Mosley
    Pac
    junior jones
    Quartey
    DLH
    The mexican greats Barrera, Marquez, Morales
    they make up for it in other ways but aren't as talented or well-schooled in that area as their predecessors were.Plus a host of other fighters who aren't on the level of these guys but were good fighters and generally worse defensively than their older counterparts in relative talent were.

    I think the 70s and 80s were the best era's for defensive specialists, with the 30s\40s to 60s being the best for sheer amount of fighters with above average\very good defensive skill.
     
  3. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    I think we need to define post pep...
     
  4. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    547
    Feb 17, 2010
    A fine point, but still.
     
  5. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Aye. I'll petition McGrain to make that a permanent part of the scenery.
     
  6. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    Compare Pea vs DLH to Floyd vs a washed up DLH. The question doesn't even deserve to be asked.

    :rofl Because Floyd didnt have the oppertunity to face better opposition..... His defensive inclination doesnt only apply when he's inside the ropes.
     
  7. Nate 2011

    Nate 2011 Active Member Full Member

    962
    7
    Aug 6, 2012
    I give "Money" Mayweather the edge against "Sweet Pea" Whittaker in the department of defense given that Whittaker's been down just a few times in his career where as Floyd Jr has only officially been down once, whether you count the slip against Zab Judah in April of 2006 or the knee he took against Carlos Hernandez in his second to last defense of his World Superfeatherweight Championship in May of 2001.

    Either way if I'm in either or both of these two corners managing them I wouldn't be too quick to put this one, F.Mayweather Jr. vs P.Whittaker, together unless I was sure that it would be a barn burner at the gate and of course the PPV buys!
     
  8. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,818
    Aug 26, 2011
    I just don't see a fight between them being a barn burner... I may be in the minority.. but I see Pea making Floyd look average. It's one of those fights where, going in, people would be thinking this is the second coming of the FOTC. After it was over, people would be clamoring for Pea to be ranked in the top ten p4p of all time because of how convincingly he would win against an ATG