Better entertainer: Prince or Floyd?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mking, Apr 21, 2010.


  1. mking

    mking Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,658
    0
    Nov 30, 2007
    The prince was funny to me.
     
  2. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Prince in the ring, floyd out.(not recent floyd, but pre-retirement floyd)
     
  3. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    The Prince of course.

    Fliyd is not entertaining. He could probably be, but far too much Hollywood around his entire carreer. In other words, most of his carreer path and legacy is scripted. Sure, they took a good fighter to begin with. They tried the same with Jermain Taylor and he wasn't good enough despite the careful matching, help with decisions and so on. So obviosuly Floyd is good, but noone really knows how good - and we probably never will.
     
  4. mking

    mking Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,658
    0
    Nov 30, 2007
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uh6oG4cEATk[/ame]

    cool vid
     
  5. G.G.

    G.G. no more mrs. nice bitch Full Member

    586
    0
    Jul 20, 2009
    Floyd acts like an idiot and runs his mouth. Some people find that entertaining. Not me.
     
  6. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    8,114
    391
    Sep 2, 2009
    Nasem's ribbing was somehow easier to take than Floyd's...PBF's mouth running comes across as annoying, while Naz's was more like..."oh, that silly foreigner!"
     
  7. mking

    mking Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,658
    0
    Nov 30, 2007

    I agree I can tolerate Naz's trash talk because maybe it was funny. Floyds looks like he's trying to hard.
     
  8. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    Hamed was more entertaining in and outside the ring!
     
  9. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Naz and Haye are 2 of the best entertainers that actually know how to entertain people in and out of the ring. Floyd is a defensive master and he's also a master of making himself look stupid when he's not fighting. At least be funny or original not be the gangsta he thinks he is. He needs to find out who he really is.
     
  10. RJD

    RJD Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,782
    0
    Dec 23, 2007
    Floyd forces himself to be a trash talker. He was a humble fighter earlier on in his career. Naz on the other hand was born to talk ****, he comes across as a lot more natural at it and thus more entertaining. The time he ripped into Kevin Kelley and told him he'd get him a job working for HBO putting up Prince Naseem posters after he knocks him out was classic Naz. On the other hand you have Floyd who rambles on about being a gorilla and a big dog but comes across as looking like a fool as he's what.. 5'8 and walks around at about 155-160.
     
  11. penmanaj

    penmanaj New Member Full Member

    28
    0
    Feb 13, 2010
  12. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    Naz was funnily arrogant. Many disliked him.

    Floyd comes off as an arrogant cry-baby.

    Both arrogant, but Floyd in an annoyingly embarrasing way.
     
  13. Ashstrodamus

    Ashstrodamus Rodney Dangerfield of ESB Full Member

    368
    1
    Jul 30, 2005
    Naz for sure. He could have been great, but his ego got in the way. He could've rebounded to beat Barrera, but he wasn't man-enough. Naz had legit "one punch KO power".
     
  14. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Naz is a ****ing brit..so why even ask this question?
     
  15. mugen82

    mugen82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,483
    0
    May 1, 2009
    Naz by a country mile, he's hilarious, Mayweather as posted above is a cry baby