42-3(35) is damn good Tito, but 107-6-2(86) is unreal to today's fighters. Chavez fought for over 20 years as a pro and spent most of that time on top. No comparison. Chavez by a wide margin.
STFU......... I've already stated that Chavez is BETTER, all around and in a P4P sense but you have lost your ****ing mind... You DO know that Tito was undefeated and in the p4p top 4 for 9 years......... Don't try to denigrate at someone's expense.......They're both LEGENDARY fighters. Know what the **** you're talking about dudeatsch
Sorry, but JCC wins this one. Sure, there is an argument both ways, but JCC clearly has a better record. I like Tito BTW. Don't bring sweet pea into this, Tito was bigger than JCC.
He beat Jose Luis Ramírez, Rafael Limon, Rocky Lockridge, Meldrick Taylor, Roger Mayweather, Lonnie Smith, Sammy Fuentes, Héctor "Macho" Camacho, Juan Laporte, Edwin Rosario, Greg Haugen, Tony López, Giovanni Parisi, Joey Gamache, and Frankie Randall. He lost to Oscar De La Hoya and Kostya Tszyu. He had a draw with Pernell Whitaker and Miguel Angel Gonzalez. They were all wolrd champions.