Better fighter: Tszyu (MA Gonzalez fight, '99) or Calzaghe (Lacy fight, '06)?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Jul 21, 2011.


  1. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    KT was regarded as an unstoppable machine heading for a showdown with ODLH until he got derailed by Phillips, he was considered to be FAR more formidable than calslappy in his prime.
     
  2. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Gonzales was a very crafty fighter who was past it at the time as was Chavez when Tszyu beat him, but MAG was still a tough opponent much better than Lacy. Id give the edge to Tszyu, but Ive always liked Joes stamina and output it was unreal. Both I think their offense was their defense. Tszyu was like Bhops, but without the defense, but with more power. Rare to see a technical fighter with bone crunching power.
     
  3. arve lie

    arve lie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,790
    6
    Feb 15, 2010
    Two really All Time Greats . Would be so interesting to see against todays 140/168
    Super middle much stronger today than five years ago.
     
  4. arve lie

    arve lie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,790
    6
    Feb 15, 2010
    Tszuy did not eat the day of a fight, believe it or not. That changed after the Philips fight.
    He also totally ignored the defensiv. If you see the amateur fight against Vernon Forrest
    his defensiv is so top-level. He became a slugger in the pro years.
    In my opinion his problem was he did not take all fights seriously. "Some fights he did not show up totally motivated." Those words i told two old americans the night before the Hatton-fight we were living in a hotel in Trafford the weekend og the fight.
     
  5. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    I understand and I agree that there is a difference between skillset and overall effectiveness, but I like to make my threads/questions as open/broad as possible to minimize the amount of time people spend debating the criteria/question, and just give whichever answer they think is appropriate. :good

    I believe that Joe Calzaghe's very calculated, carefully strategized career gives people such as yourself the impression that he is some h2h nightmare, when in reality this is not the case at all, and simple review of the video evidence would confirm this to those with a good understanding of boxing. The zero continues to fool people into thinking Calzaghe was some sort of iron-willed all-conquering stud, but the zero means nothing. I watch his fights, and I see many glaring flaws, some real sub-standard performances against sub-standard opposition, some dominant performances against cans/highly limited opposition, and then the wins over past-prime/shot names.

    Calzaghe was a very technically deficient fighter who relied extremely heavily on handspeed and workrate, and he would have been picked apart and convincingly defeated by any prime top-class fighter who had a well-rounded skillset with good defence and punching technique (that's why he never fought one). A guy with Calzaghe's wide open sloppy defence and terrible punching technique would have been bread and butter for a good counterpuncher.

    This is what the video evidence tells me. The zero means nothing. Sven Ottke wasn't unbeatable either. JMHO. :good
     
  7. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    Tszyu was the better boxer, bigger puncher, Calzaghe the smarter, faster, more adaptive fighter
    both the best of their era's in the respective divisionslike them both personally, i can't split them
     
  8. WorldBoxingTV

    WorldBoxingTV Member Full Member

    252
    0
    Feb 9, 2011
    Tszyu. Calzaghe was very good though ...
     
  9. treeve

    treeve Active Member Full Member

    1,168
    0
    Jan 9, 2010
    So Hopkins had no defense and no punching technique.
    Next you'll say he was over the hill when they fought oh wait 3 years ago.
    But now Hopkins that beat Pascal is the Shite Eh.
    You contradict yourself every Calzaghe thread jsut quit while your ahead.
     
  10. horst

    horst Guest

    I think someone has maybe had a little too much to drink with lunch today... :oops:
     
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    Another drunkard :nut
     
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    Anyone care to make some sober posts about this issue?

    There must be some people on here with opinions on the abilities of Tszyu and Calzaghe who aren't drunk as skunks??
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,533
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    Tzyu definitely. He never avenged the defeat to phillips but joe never avenged his loss to reid neither.

    Both unified the division.

    However tzyu has better names on his resume and displayed a greater skillset throughout his career.

    After tzyu knocked out judah we saw zab knock out spinks which is a feat much greater than any calzaghe victim went on to achieve.

    Tzyu is a certified hof'er who cleared out his division. Picturing the ease with which hopkins landed his rights on joe i'm convinced that he hopkins possessed tzyu's power p4p if would have knocked joe out.

    All things considered tzyu is a close but clear greater fighter.

    However regarding comparisons in these two performances, it's fair to say joe never had to get out of first gear, if dominated lacey from the off and successfully tasted his power in the opening exchanges. As dominant as the performance was joe should have stopped jeff after that ass kicking if put on him.

    Considering how highly regarded left hook was it's hard not to be impressed by the victory. But miguel was every bit as impressive p4p and was an instrumental obstacle in oscar's rise to the top however if was coming off a layoff of over a year. Tzyu was more emphatic against an opponent of better quality imo. Both did nothing of note after these defeats but mag was better proven at the time of the fight. I give kostya the edge here.
     
  14. comanick

    comanick Member Full Member

    179
    0
    Aug 8, 2010
    Tszyu! And i didnt even have to think on it.

    Joecal to me was a punk( not scared because i will never call a boxer scared). He didnt want to fight anyone that mattered. His best win is possibly a loss (hopkins) and that was against an old man. Joecal was a "so called champ" for like 10 years before he ever fought anyboby with a pulse and even they werent much(lacy and kessler).

    But skill wise Tszyu was better. Tszyu was an olympian so he had pretty solid technique. I cant say the same of joe.
     
  15. horst

    horst Guest

    Tszyu pulling ahead...