better fights...MAB/EM or Marquez?Vasquez?

Vazquez-Marquez by a mile. The other trilogy was great, but this one will be pointed to as a textbook offensive spectacle 100 years from now.

 

ITs very hard to say but Marquez-Vasquez was a little more action packed.
MAB-EM was just two in their prime ATG.
However if Marquez-Vasquez keep being impressive after this trilogy then i might give them the slight edge.
This is coming from a guy who admires EM to the fullest and also big fan of MAB.

 

The Marquez/Vazquez fights are more violent and action packed. Their trilogy will be remembered among the best ever. The Barrera/Morales fights were fought at an ATG skill level and they hated eachother too.

Barrera/Morales has my vote

 

See, that's the trick of the question though. Who they are legacy-wise shouldn't have anything to do with judging the actual trilogies in and of themselves. When you dig past that, and the hype and emotion of Morales-Barrera, it is quite clear which trilogy is far superior on its own merit.

 

Vasquez/Marquez so far.

 

I think that has everything to do with it.
Would you pick Gatti-Ward over MAB-EM??? Of course not because those were B-level fighters and alot of people agree that that trilogy was more action packed but that doesnt make it better.
They were just bar room brawls with just ordinary people.
MAB-EM was 2 elite athletes at the top of their game.
Both guys are already considered ATG.

 

EM-mab 1 was the best fight out of all 5 of them.

That fight was great enough to pick the em-mab trilogy over the marquez-vasquez trilogy (of course the 3rd has yet to be fought)

 

I think if they look impressive after this trilogy then their trilogy might surpass EM-MAB.
I would like to see either of them take on PDL and then caballero.
Maybe in a year or so take on Juan Manuel Lopez.

 

Vazquez Marquez is better imo.

 

MAB - EM, personal hatred added fuel and drama.