Better first title. Floyd Mayweather vs Genaro Hernandez, or Pacquiao vs Sasakul

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MichiganWarrior, Oct 10, 2011.


  1. LancsTerrible

    LancsTerrible Different Forms of Game. Full Member

    8,657
    14
    Aug 1, 2010
    Fair play. I'm not really going to argue too much on this issue because I see them both as quality wins. Popkins as always made a brilliant case for Sakasul being the better win and after reading that I'm starting to doubt my choice a bit.
     
  2. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008


    your an idiot, Hernandez was undefeated at 130 and looked great in his previous fights leading up to the Mayweather.
     
  3. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    :lol::lol: go back to your 50cent forum

    its like the pactads version of the hatton was undefeated at 140 oooh la la like that makes a ****en difference.
     
  4. celiac trunk

    celiac trunk Guest

    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  5. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    Sasakul was a good technical fighter but I think he was more "raw" as a fighter than Hernandez. Being a more technical boxer doesn't mean you are overall a better fighter.
     
  6. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008

    listen Pindar unlike yourself I came up in the golden age of hip hop and I'm not some 18 year old Parminder from england who's knowledge of rap consists of Jay Z, fiddy cent and lil wayne.

    i have a hip hop radio show and wouldn't be caught dead spinning 50. :deal

    go bump some big daddy kane (if you're allowed to play rap on your moms computer) and give your head a shake