Better left jab, Sonny Liston or Larry Holmes?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Richard M Murrieta, Jul 1, 2021.


  1. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,324
    11,716
    Mar 19, 2012
    Who's would you rather get hit by?
     
  2. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,903
    Mar 3, 2019
    Whose are you more likely to get hit by?
     
  3. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,271
    15,330
    Jun 9, 2007
    Neither lol
     
    ETM and Richard M Murrieta like this.
  4. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,513
    3,111
    Feb 17, 2008
    Liston.

    Harder to counter his jab than Larry's----to stiff to hang in the pocket and come over that Liston jab.
    The other big factor is Sonny's ability to throw a great left hook off that jab. Holmes had no left hook to go to. just throw more jabs
     
  5. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,984
    19,027
    Oct 4, 2016
    I've always thought Holmes had the best,,overall jab in heavyweight history considering speed ,power , reach and accuracy. But I have Liston a close second. I'd rather take 4 Holmes jabs as one of Sonny's telephone poles to the face though.
     
  6. Bah Lance

    Bah Lance Active Member banned Full Member

    1,089
    1,362
    Apr 29, 2019
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,103
    Mar 21, 2007
    Liston.

    He really, really hurt people with it. Holmes sort of worked people over with his, it was spiteful without being genuinely awful. Liston was kind of a freak. I don't think he was really equalled for hurtful jabs until the likes of Wladimir and Lewis, and he was never really lazy with it. Liston's jab mad the ring smaller. It's terrifying for a destroyer to have a jab like that and none of those guys - Foreman, Louis, Tyson, etc. - had the combination of reach and power present in the Liston jab.

    That said, it's not like the Holmes jab wasn't key to style either. I just think that for a destroying, punching, bulldog like Sonny to be armed with a jab like that is an extra dimension of unfair.
     
  8. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,080
    20,567
    Jul 30, 2014
    Billy Joiner: Well, I won the National Golden Gloves in 1962. I started my pro career in 1963. For the first match with Liston I wasn't at home training like I was supposed to. I was training, but I went to New York to train. The accommodations, my meals, and everything weren't right. So that had some bearing on the fight. I had sparred with Liston before I fought him, though. I knew what I had to do in order to survive (We both smile and laugh loudly). Liston was a good fighter. He was a great fighter, and a very strong fighter. I came in at about 195 pounds. Liston was something that it was survival for me back then, and the chance to make a little money. In the second fight, I was home training. I was more relaxed. My Dad was there, and that made a big difference.

    Question: You fought Larry Holmes in 1975 when he was starting to come up the ranks (Billy was 37 at the time of that fight). Who had the better jab: Liston or Holmes?

    Billy Joiner: Oh, no doubt. Liston.
    If I had two weeks to train for Holmes, I would've beaten him. I hadn't been in the gym in a year. I got a call right before Christmas, and was asked if I wanted to go to Puerto Rico. I had four kids, and I didn't know anything about Holmes. So I went. I jumped on him right from the beginning. I wasn't in condition. But no, there really wasn't a comparison between him at that time and Liston at the time I fought him. Liston was much stronger than Holmes. I could walk right through Holmes, but I got tired. Had I been in condition, it wouldn't have been a contest for that particular fight.

    Question: Holmes kind of threw a rising up jab (I motion from the waist upward), whereas Liston threw a straight, telephone pole-like jab.

    Billy Joiner: Right.

    Question: How did you defend differently against the different types of jabs?

    Billy Joiner: Holmes hadn't really seasoned yet at that time in his career. So, I would just walk right through him. Liston was different. His jab was like getting hit with another man’s right hand. My head was red.

    Question: Liston had an 84" reach. Was the reach that big of a factor with him?

    Billy Joiner: It's a difference if you know what you're doing. He knew what he was doing, so I couldn't really get close to him like I wanted to.

    Question: Of all of the guys you fought in your career: Zora Folley, Holmes, Blue Lewis, Liston, etc.--- who was the best guy you faced?

    Billy Joiner: It was Liston. Liston was the toughest guy.
     
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,652
    46,303
    Feb 11, 2005
  10. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,655
    11,518
    Mar 23, 2019
    I think Larry threw his jab with the most venom. In fact, whenever I think of Rooney telling Tyson to punch with bad intentions, I think of the vicious, ugly-as-hell, venomous conviction that Holmes twisted into his jab.

    That said, I would rather NOT get his with one of Liston's walk-in jabs.
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,562
    Apr 27, 2005
    A poll would have been good with this one as Liston is getting some love as well. Not much between these two jabs.
     
  12. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,228
    1,640
    Sep 13, 2006
    There is no doubt that Liston’s jab was way more powerful and heavier. So he wins on the raw power equation. However, overall, I think Larry Holmes had the better jab. He relied on it much more, controlled fights with it, threw it more often, and it was more relaxed and faster, and seemingly better educated with better timing.
     
  13. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,997
    12,322
    May 8, 2014
    Liston. Holmes jab got countered a lot.
     
    ETM and swagdelfadeel like this.
  14. AwardedSteak863

    AwardedSteak863 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,063
    11,263
    Aug 16, 2018
    I'm not so sure that there is a wrong answer to this question as both had very different yet great jabs. I'm going with Liston though since his was more of a punishing, hurtful weapon.
     
    TipNom, Reinhardt and swagdelfadeel like this.
  15. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,080
    20,567
    Jul 30, 2014
    A Jab Unlike Any Other Great fighters have great jabs. The most basic of all punches, a jab stings but it rarely wounds. It’s as much a defensive weapon as it is an offensive one because it’s hard for an opponent to mount an attack when a jab is always in his face. Mike Tyson learned that the hard way against Buster Douglas whose jab, for one memorable night at least, made him look like a great fighter. I’m amused when I read that Sonny Liston had one of the best jabs in history. Say what you will about the jabs of Joe Louis, Muhammad Ali, and Larry Holmes, but their jabs didn’t come close to being the weapon that Liston’s was.

    Trainer Johnny Tocco saw Sonny knock guys out with a single jab. Angelo Dundee saw Liston knock people’s teeth out with his jab and likened it to a battering ram. Rocky Marciano speculated that being hit with it was like running into a boxcar or a trailer truck. “I developed that jab myself,” said Sonny. “I jab wherever his head is. I jab to hurt. That’s all.”

    His sparring partners called it the Cannon and its impact was fueled by his massive 15½-inch fists and 84-inch reach. “His jab always lands around the temple,” said sparring partner Ben Skelton, who worked with 11 heavyweight and light heavyweight champions. “I’ve never felt a punch to equal it, and that includes Joe Louis.” Sonny had learned on the streets and in prison that you couldn’t survive without a good jab. “Man, you don’t hit first there, you don’t hit,” he would say. “Keep poppin’ that jab right to the middle of the forehead and the other guy can’t punch right because he’s never got the balance to punch right.”

    In his book, My Life Story, Joe Louis counseled young boxers to jab through their target rather than at it. Liston went Louis one better by bludgeoning his opponents with it. When asked how he would have fought Sonny, Joe said: “Well, I wouldn’t have jabbed with him.” “

    He knocked me out with a right but it was that left jab that did the original damage,” said Cleveland Williams. “The left jab numbed me.” Chuck Wepner was Liston’s final opponent and claimed he heard his bones shattering when Sonny’s jab landed. Ray Schoeninger sparred with Liston in Denver in the mid-1960s and said the stitching in his headgear came apart when Sonny hit him. “He shattered my teeth. He knocked my shoulder out of place. Hey, I lost three teeth when he hit me with a jab wearing 20-ounce gloves. He knocked me on my ass from a foot away,” said Schoeninger.

    A jab stings but it rarely wounds. Liston’s jab was the exception to that rule. More to the point, Sonny’s jab was the rule.

    Wish I could post the source but it's unfortunately on the now defunct boxing.com
     
    TipNom, ETM, Reinhardt and 4 others like this.