Better Legacy: De La Hoya or Mayweather?

Whitaker won that fight. He outlanded Oscar, clowned him and dropped him.

 

and castillo beat floyd.

So do we let the judges speak or do we use common sense?
I can never tell with you floyd fans.

 

I seriously doubt you've seen PBF-JLC 1 or Whitaker-Oscar for that matter.:-(

 

What does the record say? If you're gonna go there then we can take Castillo I from Floyd and add Trinidad and may be even Mosley II to Delahoya.

 

either or and only when it works in my favor :deal

 

hahahhahaahahahah

 

They're both on my external harddrive.

 

How was Camacho the bigger man? because he put on a **** load of bulky unecessary muscle?

He was 5'6 with a 69 inch reach. Oscar was clearly towrering over him.

 

C'mon - don't do that to your credibility, height doesn't make somebody the bigger man. Camacho came down to WW to fight DLH. At least 10 fights before that were at Super WW and Middle Weight. After the DLH fight he went back up to MW.

 

De La Hoya had a 4 1/2 inch height advantage, a 4 inch reach advantage, but because Camacho was bouncing around weights like a pinball, looking slow and lethargic against journeymen, he was the bigger man?


Dude just take Camachos name off that list. Everyone knows he was at his best at 130, and after he left was never the same, and even almost lost a decision to Roberto Duran.

 

Heh... yes he did... EVERY one of them. So I don't see how his resume is better than Floyd's. Doesn't make sense.

 

Those of you who say **** like that just prove that you're idiots, or haven't been boxing fans for that long.

 

What?!? His only loss at WW, SWW, MW prior to Delahoya was against Trinidad. He was fighting succesfully at those weights, and had been there for long before he faced Delahoya. When he fought DLH it had been like 15 years since he was in the 130 range.