Manny Pac beating David Diaz at 135 instead of Nate Campbell or Broner picking up 147 title vs Paulie instead of PBF or even Alexander for that matter? I would say Paulie is better then David Diaz but both titles really mean nothing in the grand scheme neither is recognized as the best. Your thoughts....
I remember Zahir Raheem kicking Morales' ass, then Manny Pacquiao kicking Morales' ass, then Morales losing a controversial fight to David Diaz. I do not recall anyone really giving David Diaz a chance.
Broner is still jumping 2 divisions to take on a vastly experienced world champion in a strong division,a very bold move Do you really think he would go from fighting Gavin Rees at lightweight to floyd mayweather at welter.suicide
Paulie is nothing more then a contender w/ an ABC belt. Let's not refer to him as World champ, even if it IS just to hype him a little. To be realistic, he's just a two division top contender.
Its a cherry pick. The shock will happen when he starts eating the cherry only to realize its a dingle berry.
Broner is in a lose-lose. If he gets beat, then he got beat by Paulie, but if he wins, then he just beat the weakest title holder.
