Better quality of opposition: Cotto or Margarito?

Cotto

 

I'd say Judah, Mosley and Quintana put Cotto over the top. Up until that point they were about even

 

This question is ridiculous.

Cotto by far. Antonio Margarito's resume sucks: his best wins are over a guy that built his reputation beating Mark ****in Suarez. :rofl

 

Is this a serious question??? Margo fought Williams and lost, Santos and lost, and a bunch of scrubs.

 

but he would still kick you and your **** lovin' fathers ass on the same minute.

 

I am saying that Margarito's resume sucks not because of his loses, but because his best wins: Kermit Cintron.

 

I would bet not, they have weights for a reason. I could cut off both legs and still out weight Margo by 50 pounds, not to mention Im pretty nice with my hands:bbb

 

combined opponents records of cotto hatton and margo.

Cotto
747-155-18 (6 undefeated)

Hatton
940-383-65 (3 undefeated)

Margarito
828-208-24 (6 undefeated)

 

you would outweigh me by 50 pounds too but i'd still molest you like you were my step son.

 

Cotto

 

hows your ass?:hi:

 

Cotto, no question

 

Cotto but don't play like Margo has had it easy. He's had one of the toughest roads as a pro.

Cotto on the other hand has been nurtured and it makes obvious sense that his record and resume of wins would be better.

Besides what difference does it make. If best wins and resumes meant something then Glen Johnson wouldn't have come close to controversy against Chad Dawson.