hate to break it to you, but all names are words in the ultimate sense, as you just described yourself, so don't get in a huff about what you yourself claim when I claim it. In the instance you previously quoted me, I used cowardzaghe as name and not a descriptive word. You have now quoted me afresh using it as a descriptive word, which is an entirely different quote, and its absolutely allowed in the English language. Observe - - one can choose to describe someone who is not Jake la motta, as "a bit of a jake la motta", if they share the characteristics of mr jake la motta. This is I am sure not beyond you to understand, I am sure readers will agree on reading your posts. oh yes ...they will.
Read what I wrote again genius. You said it was a name, not a word. However I have proven all words, even slang words, internet jargon etc. have a meaning. Now you denied that "cowardzaghe" has a meaning, something I proven that there is a meaning..as you yourself use it to convey meaning. You also denied it was a word, and it is a name: Something I proved wrong too... Now it's funny you mention it to describe Joe. You previously said this: But here, you do use it to describe Joe: So you are contradicting yourself again here....you have to make up your mind Herol, either you use it to describe him or not.
the context of your original question was about the name. In your new quotes its used as a description of characteristics shared by the person named. Why are you swapping contexts and yet pretending its me doing the swapping? My contexts are completely different - one is for the use as the name (he is jake lamotta), one for use as a description to show similar characteristics (hes a bit of a jake la motta). let me know why you are doing this. Unless the two mean the same to you, in which case you live in a simplified world where you think someone called Mr Bla.ckman is always a bla.ckman. That cant be easy for you.
So you finally admit that every name is a word...this contradicts what you said a short while ago: Now, again could you please make up your ****ing mind? Jake La Motta and "cowardzaghe" cannot be compared...as nobody knows what "cowardzaghe" means... Jake La Motta as a desrciptive term makes perfect sense as everyone here knows what Jake La Motta means and what it stands for....however nobody knows what "Cowardzaghe" means which boils down to my initial question a few days ago..... What are the "characteristics" of a cowardzaghe as you say? Once again you're contradicting yourself. You say it has no meaning, but then you say it is used to describe someone...which is what giving meaning means...to describe...to define... You said it was a name, not a word....but now you say You are a walking contradiction...
you mean you haven't finally admiited that a name is not a descriptive word unless you use it so. Lets see if you do. that depends how you use it. if you use it as a derogatory, it can mean bad things, like the way that guy on youtube uses it. if you use it in a nice sense, it means reflecting te characteristics of joe, like great stamina shown in his ability to run extremely fast and for vast distances. only until you acknowledge that you shifted contexts. When you do admit it, you'll have some explaining to do.
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS. Finally, the child admits it....he has been using it in the derogatory sense all along. Finally!!! I'm so happy you caught yourself out. :happy:happy For example: Now you cannot say "cowardzaghe" there is complimenting Joe...it's being derogative towards him... Ding Ding Here also, you are using it in the derogative sense: Here, you not only say cowardzaghe in the derogative sense, but you also imply Calzaghe is a coward: This is funny that you actually refer to Joe as a coward when you previously said: Soooo...again, you're contradicting yourself. Here again, you use the term cowardzaghe in the bad sense: Here again: Truth is finally out guys, HerolGee uses the term "cowardzaghe" in a bad sense, in the derogative...in order to make fun/mock Joe Calzaghe. Truth is out, thank you Herol for dun goofing himself
Even more contradicitons here: But Herol always said: And then he said this: So....either Herol is complimenting Joe, or being derogative...and he always claims he never does the latter. But there are hundreds of posts claiming otherwise, I just selected the first few I saw Everyone, on 3....1-2-3...."FLOP MATE"
Herol will not admit he had derogatory intentions towards Joe and his fans,,, that would take truth and integrity :rasta
for someone who isnt recognising context, sure its interpreted by them as a flop, I'm good with that.