interesting bump though I would still say its 3G. he won a major title by that age, joe had yet too (although his wbo title became a "major" shortly after joe turned 34). 3G has a more resounding set of victories too. there are no near misses on his cv, whereas joe can be said to have lost.
It's hilarious how some people are still shameless enough to bring Eubank into this even though he was clearly past it. Might as well bring up the RJJ victory as if it was something extraordinary too.