Better resume at Welterweight...Jose Napoles or Emile Griffith?

modern nutrition deserves a mention

 

Frank bruno destroys both if he has a decent training regime.

 

Griffith fought the better fighters but there is a lot of controversy surrounding his reign...Whereas there is almost none with Jose's dominant reign.

Jose also probably had optimal muscle glycogen levels compared to Emile.

 

Whoever drank more amino acid tablets.

 

Griffith. He fought everybody. Then again he didn't beat everybody either.

 

Napoles>>>>>>>>>>>>>Griffith

 

Hey, don't diss Yama Bahama, PP :fire

The real question would be; LMR or Napoles IMO :good

 

On paper, Griffith by a huge margin.

In reality, a much tougher question. Taking away the Rodriguez wins and perhaps the first Ortega and Fernandez wins (does the latter count as a welter bout?), it's more questionable.

 

Yama Bahama was the ****en man. He'd own the middleweight and jnr middleweight divisions today with ease.

 

Yep, looked good to me. I fought that was at Welter though, my mistake :good

 

Napoles was more dominant, Griffith had a better era but was inconsistent at times and wasn't clearly the best Welterweight.

 

Based on resume at Welterweight I give a slight edge to Napoles.