Better Resume Building up to winning the title..

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KuRuPT, Jan 27, 2012.


  1. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Rank them in order and why please:

    1. Jack Johnson
    2. Rocky Marciano
    3. Liston
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,890
    47,877
    Mar 21, 2007
    Probably Johnson just edges it from the other two, there won't be much between them.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,917
    21,467
    Sep 15, 2009
    Johnson: pre title he'd already established a top 15 resume and once he'd beaten burns and jeffries between 08 and 10 it was more icing on the cake than establishing his greatness.

    Liston again he'd almost entirely secured his legacy prior to defeating floyd. Probably a top 20 resume until that point with the victories over floyd making his h2h ranking fly into the top 5 or so.

    Rocky comes last because his legacy is pretty much entirely based on his title capture and defences.

    Essentially if I remove the career of these guys from the title victory onwards I think i'd rank them in this order based on resume.
     
  4. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    Rocky's opponents were abysmal while building his record. Most had lots of losses and many had more losses than wins. Quite a few .500 fighters too.
     
  5. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
    Johnson
    Liston
    Marciano

    Luf explained why pretty good.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,550
    27,177
    Feb 15, 2006
    Jersey Joe Walcott has to be right up there among the best resumes pre title.

    By the time he won the title, his resume was about as good as it was ever going to get.

    Not wishing to get off topic.
     
  7. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011

    I don't think the wins over Patterson should add an awful lot to his h2h rating, but that's just my personal perception. Floyd, a terrified, somewhat chinny, short-reach, blown-up light-heavy who utilized quite a come-forward attacking style.
    With hindsight maybe, but he's almost the perfect foil for Liston.

    I think Liston's wins over Cleveland Williams and Eddie Machen, (and probably Folley), and the manner of the victories are more insightful to Liston's h2h ability.
     
  8. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011
    Probably Johnson has the best resume pre-title. I'm not too familiar with the details though.


    Marciano and Liston .... it's close.
    I guess I'd say Marciano 'cos he beat Joe Louis. A washed-up Louis, 137 years old etc., but it's still kind of Joe Louis, isn't it.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,917
    21,467
    Sep 15, 2009
    Perhaps but i'm a huge believer in significance.

    Liston's destruction of patterson underlined how supreme he was in relation to that 60-64 era.
     
  10. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Janitor brought up a good point... maybe we should substitute Walcott for Marciano...
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,917
    21,467
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah, despite his victory over bivins being quite controversial and dubious, I think he actually beat every man in the top ten consecutively before fighting louis.

    It's a shame the full footage isn't available of that first title fight because reports are split on who deserved it. Jersey's reputation could significantly improve if the full fight was there and he deserved even just a draw.
     
  12. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    He certainly did deserve AT LEAST a draw Luf.. I thought that much was clear. When the majority of ring side reporters and spectators fell Walcott won.. I think that is enough to say he either deserved a close decision or at least a draw... I didn't think at least a draw was ever in question. Even in the second fight.. you can see how the first fight probably went... Walcott dominated the second fight and was ahead by a good amount.. until his CONSTANT showboating finally caught up to him.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,917
    21,467
    Sep 15, 2009
    Well I think the ringside reports are actually fairly split upon the deserved victor.

    The rematch just shows that louis came from behind to stop him, it doesn't show anything about the first fight.

    When reports are split and sufficient footage isn't available, I have no choice but to take the result at face value.
     
  14. Tin Man Waldo

    Tin Man Waldo Freakishly Fragile Full Member

    726
    2
    May 19, 2011
  15. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    That is just the thing... the reports AREN'T split.. they favor Walcott.. As me and Janitor discussed before. Some say they clearly favor walcott..while janitor believes they slightly favor walcott. In either case, it's not split. So when reports are favoring and or slightly favoring... how can you accept the result at face value? Further, how can you claim the second fight didn't show what probably went down in the first fight. Louis had time to adjust his tactics and learn from the first fight, and yet, walcott was clear and away dominating the second fight... Some say again. So, I'm not sure how you can give littlle meaning to the second fight and how it factors into the first fight... when people more people were claiming walcott won the first fight. It's not like most people felt like Louis won the first fight.. and the second fight was a totally different look before the KO. It's actually the opposite of that... More people thought Walcott won the first fight and was clearly winning the second fight before HIS SHOWBOATING cost him dearly. Do you also not think the outcome might've been a lot different, and even probably different, had Walcott not continued to showboat?