Better RESUME: Crawford or GGG

obv buds is much better for same age.

bbut then 3g wasnt concerned with rising to world level until late in his career, so its different.

i tihnk when 3g unifies smw then u will find he ecipses anything bud will ever do, watch this space

This content is protected

if u doubt me. u can quote me if u like, i am fully confident.

 

If by "took the best of him", you mean got stopped, put in the hospital, and knocked out of boxing for 2 years, then sure

 

GGG: 2x Clenelo, Jacobs

That's enough to point out.

 

Jesus Christ, only reading the first page of this thread and I'm astonished by the blatant fanboyism/not knowing **** about boxing. These cucks even use unofficial, opinionated wins(Alvarez_ as a back up to their argument.


GGG's resume/accomplishments don't even come close to Crawfords... I simply cannot see how you can argue otherwise unless you're biased fanboy of course.

 

Excellent effort on your side to prove otherwise.... a simple 'no' post from you woulda saved you time.

 

Because there's simply too much stuff to list to correct you fan girls, GGG did not make 19 defenses of a world title, did not beat Alvarez, he also never unified the division, winning 2 out of 3 vacant belts during his tenure.

Jacobs, Lemmy and Geale isn't better than the body of work Crawford has done in 3 weight classes(GGG has never moved up), he's been lineal in two(something GGG has never done) and completely unifying one(again, something GGG has never done) and also being dominant in all of his fights, GGG stopped being dominant as soon as he stepped up in competition.

You people overrate Daniel Jacobs beyond belief after his close loss with GGG, when everyone and their mom all thought Jacobs was a glass jawed fraud before and stood no chance vs GGG. Since his close loss, he's looked less dominant than before and has had 2 close fights in a row. Once Canelo finishes him, I hope that'll be the end of this Jacobs hype. I don't even gotta talk about Lemmy or Geale, there's really not that much to talk about.

I simply cannot find a reasonable argument on GGG being more accomplished or having a better resume than Crawford. I haven't seen 1 in this thread yet, not 1.

 

althpugh bud has done 2 divisions, he never really dominated any.

althugh to be fair. 3G has only won one title in the ring in his division, his others were gifted him outside the ring.

and to be fair to bud all his titles he won fair and square, all major ones, not bum ones ever.

so its a mixed bag.

 

Can't take you serious at all. You're a straight up 3G hater, not expecting rationale from you Dan... You guys put TOO much worth in to moving up...

 

You ask me to prove my point and when I did, you post this.

The whole post was rational and filled with 100% facts. Prove otherwise, if you can't, don't respond to my posts.

 

You didn't prove anything though... good effort at least.

 

I proved why GGG doesn't have a better resume than Crawford with facts, while you provided nothing at all except wasting my time.

 

Again...you didn't really. You proved you have an opinion... and that's fine. Moving up doesn't mean anything, other then at one point you couldn't make weight. Too many of you act as if guys move up for the challenge. No, getting KO'd or not making weight is why 99% of boxers move to the next.

And you won't give credit for jacobs because YOU believe he's overrated by others. All you did was discredit certain opponents of 3G while saying NOTHING of TC's op.

like i said, you are known 3G hater on the forum. Your post was completely predictable.

 

<_< Saying GGG won 2 out of 3 vacant belts, that he doesn't have 19 defenses, that he was never lineal, never undisputed, never moved up, and never tested himself isn't an opinion. These are all facts. How doesn't moving up and beating champions in a bigger weight not mean anything, wtf are you talking about, since when? When have you started watching boxing exactly to make this baseless claim? 90% of the ATG's in the past barring heavyweights have specifically moved up for legacy alone, but I'm sure you know this. You're just playing stupid because GGG cowered in fear in front of Andre Ward and never wanted to test himself vs a bigger man. His whole career he has waited for handouts and spent all of his prime looking for a big pay day from midgets like Floyd, Cotto and Canelo. When he finally got the big fight he wanted he lost! That's basically GGG's career in a nutshell.


Jacobs is overrated and once Canelo beats him I hope the hype dies down.

Regarding Crawfords opposition, he obviously doesn't have an ATG resume, but it has way more depth and filled with B class fighters across 3 weight divisions rather than C and B fighters in 1 division like GGG.