Better resume Froch or Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ajackman1, Jul 11, 2012.


  1. ajackman1

    ajackman1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,388
    0
    Feb 16, 2012
    who do you think ?
     
  2. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,867
    Apr 19, 2010
  3. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    Not this week.

    The Haye/Chisora final press conference is about to start and you're dragging up this tired debate.
     
  4. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    froch won by landslide last time, look it up.
     
  5. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    aint a damn thing to think about, froch by 100 miles.
     
  6. Mavellous Mark

    Mavellous Mark Active Member Full Member

    508
    0
    Sep 10, 2009
    Better resume: Froch, Better Boxer: Calzaghe
     
  7. knockout artist

    knockout artist Boxing Addict banned

    6,846
    12
    Sep 24, 2011
    I'm a fan of both, Joe Calzaghe clearly has the better resume, and is greater H2H. Would Froch beat the likes of Eubank, prime Reid Kessler and Hopkins? I don't think so, Joe would beat everyone Froch has faced in my opinion. Joe was also undisputed SMW champion, and beat the man at LHW. He also has a perfect record. But Froch has still got a few more fights left in him, so he can still enhance his legacy
     
  8. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    you a damn lie, easier opposition does not mean better boxer. froch fought beasty fighters in all styles and in there primes. you think joe would have been undefeated if he switched resumes with froch ? i sure as hell dont think so
    froch fought the very elite.only thing joe had over carl is speed, carl has the power, the grit, the will to steam roll over that pity pat boxer.
     
  9. biglemon

    biglemon Guest

    Froch and its not close, Calzaghe probably beterr h2h.
     
  10. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Likes of Eubank? Eubank was over the hill when joe got to him. Reid would get it whooped by Froch and Joe too. Prime hopkins LMAO.
     
  11. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    i don't even think Joe was a better boxer. Quickier yea. Joe slaps harder than a girl, i give him that.
     
  12. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Froch by so far that d answer was obvious .
     
  13. knockout artist

    knockout artist Boxing Addict banned

    6,846
    12
    Sep 24, 2011
    After losing to Joe, Eubank turned in two excellent performances against Thompson. Prime Reid is capable of beating froch . Hopkins was on the best run of his career when Joe beat him, after losing to Joe, he turned in a career best performance against Pavlik. Joe also outpointed a prime undefeated Kessler, who when inactive and past his prime best Froch. Joe fought and beat better fighters than anyone Froch beat
     
  14. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    just bc Bhop crapped out a win here and there i still don't rate him as prime. He was throwing single digits per round due to him being old as hell. I don't like froch's mouth and his robbery against Dirrell but he have the better resume and fought more prime guys than Joe. Joe beat better name guys but they are mostly over the hill. It is what it is.
     
  15. general zod

    general zod World Champion Full Member

    6,744
    51
    Apr 7, 2010
    I dont think its really fair to be comparing their resumes at this stage in Froch's career. He still has a few more years to go.