Better resume: Joe Frazier or George Foreman

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MaccaveliMacc, Jul 14, 2025 at 6:34 AM.


Better CV:

  1. George Foreman

  2. Joe Frazier

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,756
    5,638
    Feb 27, 2024
    Big George proved he was a better fighter than Smokin' Joe twice. But did he also have a better resume?
     
  2. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,689
    5,730
    Aug 27, 2020
    Both guys' wins vs ranked Heavyweights:

    Joe Frazier:

    Muhammad Ali
    Jimmy Ellis x2
    Jerry Quarry x2
    Joe Bugner
    Eddie Machen
    Oscar Bonavena x2
    Doug Jones
    George Chuvalo
    Manuel Ramos

    George Foreman:

    Joe Frazier x2
    Ken Norton
    Ron Lyle
    George Chuvalo
    Michael Moorer
    Chuck Wepner
    Gregorio Peralta x2
    Gerry Cooney
    Jose Roman
    Scott Ledoux

    I'm gonna go with Frazier. They happen to be dead even in terms of ranked wins, with 12. But the Ali win > both Frazier wins, Quarry x2 >> Lyle for obvious reasons, and while the Norton and Moorer wins are great, George's resume falls pretty hard after that. Chuvalo aside (who Frazier also beat and even closer to his peak), guys like Wepner, Peralta (really just a blown up LHW, not better than even the Foster win), Roman and Ledoux were either ranked close to the very bottom of the top 10 list or for all of 5 minutes. Guys like Ellis and Bonavena were top contenders, and even Ramos had a brief period where he shined with wins over Machen and Terrell and got a top 5 ranking.

    Even Cooney in his prime wasn't that much better than a Joe Bugner, and he had like what, 2 fights in the prior 5 years ? Whereas Foreman already had 20 fights under his belt in his comeback by that point. Like yeah, George was really old, but 1 fight in 3 years vs 20 fights in 3 years isn't something we can just ignore due to age when Foreman was close to his peak comeback form by that point.

    Love Foreman but yeah, it's Frazier for me. Best win between the 2, Foreman has the best second and third win, but Frazier's 4-12 is better than Foreman's 4-12.
     
  3. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,735
    16,660
    Apr 3, 2012
    Frazier by default since he had both a real title reign and arguably the best win in heavyweight history. Foreman’s resume is like putting icing on a cake that was never fully baked to begin with.
     
  4. SouthpawsRule

    SouthpawsRule Member Full Member

    231
    284
    Jul 2, 2025
    Foreman for sure. Their opponents are relatively even when you exclude their best wins, but dominating Frazier himself 2x and Norton > beating Ali once and losing the next two fights with him.

    Foreman also has his 90s career. Cooney is a good win and him regaining the title against a prime Moorer at 45 comfortably bums him up above Frazier imo.
     
    MaccaveliMacc and ThatOne like this.
  5. Philosopher

    Philosopher Active Member Full Member

    1,331
    2,048
    Aug 10, 2024
    If Foreman had beaten Godzilla, King Kong and the Red Army, it still wouldn't be above FOC. Frazier for me.
     
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2025 at 9:36 AM
    MaccaveliMacc likes this.
  6. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,735
    16,660
    Apr 3, 2012
    If that’s a reference to Luis Ortiz, Foreman would leave the ring humiliated.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,319
    43,316
    Apr 27, 2005
  8. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    15,964
    14,823
    Jun 9, 2007