Better Resume/Legacy Floyd Mayweather Jr. or Marvelous Marvin Hagler?

Hagler's win over Tommy Hearns alone is far above anything Floyd has accomplished, this is a ridiculous question.

 

Same here atsch

 

Bigger guys beating up smaller guys = hell of an accomplishment lol.

I guess Floyd should get massive credit for fighting JMM.

Dumbasses i swear.

Hagler's win over Hearn and Duran are good wins but wow what a shocker that he won right right?

 

Lets applaud Wlad for beating Ward if the fight ever happens for a great win!

 

look at this ***** getting all mad in this thread.
i bet pac on bradley once and didn't expect incompetent judging. i don't care much for vcash as much as you do.

 

How many bouts did Hearns have at 160 going into the Hagler fight? Zero. Against Leonard at 147, he was 32-0 (30 KOs), favored to win and it was a unification bout to determine the Undisputed Champion of the division. Nobody really rates him at 160, even in a H2H sense. He's one of the most freakishly equipped Welterweights (and Junior Middles) in the history of the sport. Points for taking him out early, but not enough to overcome it in the slightest. Barkley would also stop him within three.

 

Did this dumbass just say Haglers win over Hearns is greater than Leonards lol?

 

Your vcash is disgraceful.

 

You should've known that ur hero will partake in fix fights. . Never go all in on a TR fighter. Loaded gloves, doping, fix fights, paid off judges, paid off refs. what a dumbass.

Hey buddy turn that 75 to more like i did. I got burned to the ground for draws since the vcash system is messed up. But i know u can't bc all u follow is pac and maybe donaire.

 

Yes, he did.

:verysad

 

SRL's victories over Hearns and Hagler stomps Hagler's wins over Duran and Hearns by 4 folds. Hagler is king in MW :happy. Thats it.

Head to toe Floyd beats Halger. Skills, accomplishments.

 

Hagler's only goal was to be the greatest middleweight ever. He got himself a spot in the Top 4, without too much argument. Lost his crown to a natural welterweight who had one fight in the previous five years going into it and had never fought at 160. Played himself thinking he could outbox Leonard and blew the first third of the fight.

This content is protected

 

There are three ways to answer this:
1. The set of people who know the least will say Floyd, excluding Pac fans
2. The set of people who really think they know what they're talking about will say Hagler
3. The people who actually know what they're talking about will say Floyd

And it's clear cut. Hagler had 12 middleweight title defenses. His best win is against Hearns, which I think is better than any of Floyd's wins...but Hearns had moved up from welter and beating him at middle was not an impossible feat. Other than that, Hagler's resume is weak compared to Floyd's. It features wins over Hamsho (good), Mugabi (good except Mugabi accomplished absolutely nothing in his career other than losing to Hagler), Duran (not really that good), Antuofermo (past it), and Minter (decent). But that's about it.

I won't break Floyd's resume down, but he's beaten more champions and HOFers/future HOFers, made more title defenses, had success in many weightclasses, won more titles, and had more longevity than Hagler. And he's undefeated and still going. The case is already closed on Floyd's career being better.

 

sorry i misunderstood your earlier post i meant the win for hagler personally meant alot because only after he knocked tommy did people started to recognize him more

 

One of the dumbest polls ever.