Better Resume: Manny Pacquiao or Pernell Whitaker?

supreme afrcan american black fighter with a KO ratio of 30 % something

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

pac is like 68 %.... :yep:yep:yep:yep

 

Gotta love boxrec warriors. He dominated Chavez and Ramirez, was robbed on both fights. Tihs alone shows that you don't know what the **** you are talking about.
Many people had him beating a prime Oscar. And his first CLEAR loss came against Tito when he was way past him best.

 

yeah, that would be huge, but expect for the excuses

 

yeah, teach your ebonics to your 3rd grader black iguana nut:nut

30 % something ko ratio against 68% something for pac :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

So Pac is better....right????

and anybody having a higher percentage than Pac is better than Pac too???

 

[url]http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:15496[/url]

Quote about the Ramirez fight = "This fight is largely considered to be a robbery"

[url]http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:15498[/url]

Quote about the Chavez fight = "Before the scorecards were announced the Showtime television commentators were in unanimous agreement that Whitaker had won the bout and didn't even consider it to be a close contest. Just later, the scorecards were announced and the fight was declared a draw. This prompted some boos even among some of Chavez's fans as they recognized that Whitaker was the true winner of the contest. Several members of the media, such as The Ring magazine and Sports Illustrated were disgusted with the decision. Later on several journalists complained of the fact that the WBC appointed the judges to the fight rather than the independent

This content is protected

. This promoted widespread calls of corruption for the world titles to banish this practice; however nothing was done and this practice is still in effect today."

[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pernell_Whitaker[/url]

Quote about the De La Hoya fight = He met a bigger, younger Oscar De La Hoya on April 12, 1997 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Whitaker succeeded in making de la Hoya look bad through his crafty defense, but he was unable to mount a sufficient offense to convince the judges, and despite receiving an official knockdown de la Hoya won by a disputed unanimous decision. After this fight Pernell Whitaker looked at the judges scorecards and laughed in disgust.

Do some research...

 

Vitali is the GOAT.

 

That's what he did, and that's what he has done all the time.

 

Clearly Edwin Valero >>> Pac.

(funny thing is, I LOVE Pac...one of my favorite fighters...but the idiots on here are just too out of control for me)

 

Well yeah, there's always that. But what can you do. :conf

 

Valero has a 100% KO%...clearly better than Pac, right???

 

now boxrec my ass. Dominated?? very convinient for you to say to save wet pea's resume. record stands and he lost before. he lost to ramirez and although chavez could go either way, oscar whooped him and so tito. wet pea made you think he was winning the oscar fight because he loved to clown as if he got the upper hand and you guys think showboating and clowning constitutes a "W", but oscar damaged him pretty well while wet pea kept on clowning. trinidad gave him a beating. dont give me the excuse of pernell not the prime fighter he was during those fights. period

 

Somebody lock this guy up, and give him a year long, no days off, 12 hour crash course in English lol...

 

He is one of the biggest idiots.... there are other Pac fans you can talk to and discuss a fight without having to read all this garbage...