Better resume Mayeather or De la Hoya

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by motorcity, Jul 7, 2011.


  1. motorcity

    motorcity Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,390
    0
    Mar 13, 2010
    Who has the better resume between the two:

    Mayweather:
    Mosley
    Marquez
    Hatton
    DLH
    Judah
    Baldomir
    N'dou
    Corley
    Brussels
    Castillo
    Jesus Chavez
    Corales
    Manfredy
    G. Hernandez
    Gatti

    De La Hoya:
    Mayorga
    Forbes
    Pacquiao
    Hopkins
    Sturn
    Vargas
    Trinidad
    Castillejo
    Leija
    Oba Carr
    Jeff Mayweather
    Quartey
    Gatti
    Whitaker
    Camacho
    Julio C Chavez


    Things to consider:
    Floyd has 0 losses
    DLH has 6: Pacquiao, Mayweather, Hopkins, Mosley,2x and Trinidad

    Possible gift decisons for DLH: Whitaker, Quartey and Sturn
    Possible gifts against DLH: Trinidad Mosley 2

    Possible gifts for Mayweather: Castillo 1
     
  2. evalistinho

    evalistinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,476
    2
    Feb 27, 2008
    If we are just talking names on resume Oscar is the Boss.
     
  3. peakbay

    peakbay Active Member Full Member

    1,157
    11
    Mar 29, 2010
    if your just looking at who they fought i would say DLH but the timing was right for some and then he lost most of his big fights so it has to be mayweather
     
  4. JoeCamelTow

    JoeCamelTow Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,900
    4
    Dec 27, 2010
    DLH easily.

    There's noone on Floyd's resume that DLH would not have starched(except for DLH/Mosley prime4prime) whereas I can see Floyd losing to some of the names on DLH's resume.

    By the way G Hernandez(RIP) was also a DLH win, as well as a couple of other decent scalps in Ruelas and Mago Gonzalez!
     
  5. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,140
    10,561
    Jul 28, 2009
    It's very, very easily ODLH... ****'s sake.

    :patsch He officially beat 19 world champions, in twenty victories. Yeah, lost all those important ones, I see.
     
  6. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    Mayweather.

    De la Hoya fought better fighters, but lost to most of them.
     
  7. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    De La Hoya beating a very game Whitaker (even if he lost or drew, spirited performance), out-boxed a prime Trinidad, Knocked Vargas out, should have a W against a younger Mosley in the second fight, took on and fought on even terms in the early part of the Hopkins fight seeking a 7th world title against a bigger veteran ATG, knocked out Mayorga when already past his prime, and even though he lost clearly, was still able to give a prime Mayweather trouble with his offense and boxing skill.

    That's not even counting his admirable accomplishments below-welterweight and a slew of controversial decisions and victories (Quartey, Chavez, Campas, Medina, Molina...etc.)

    Mayweather's career was very good in terms of accomplishments before he moved up to welterweight. Since then, his opponents haven't always been at their best and the time he's spent out of the ring things out the depth of his accomplishments there.
     
  8. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    Mayweather easy! DLH lost almost all his big fights
     
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    I scored the Trinidad and second Mosley fights to Oscar by 4 and 5 points respectively. I did not view these as particularly close fights. Both are superior wins to ANYTHING on the Mayweather resume.

    I scored the Whitaker and Quartey fights against Oscar, had Pea and Ike both winning by 1 point, extremely close fights. Both guys even at the point Oscar fought them were superior to ANYONE Floyd fought at welterweight, or anywhere else.


    I scored the Sturm-DLH fight for Sturm, but I don't view it as all that relevant, Oscar had no business being at 160.



    I scored the 1st Floyd-Castillo fight to JLC by 2 points.



    Oscar fought much, much tougher competition, so defeats are natural. I believe that if Floyd had fought Tszyu, Margarito, Cotto, Williams, a younger Mosley, and Pacquiao, rather than ducking and retiring, he'd have incurred a loss or two along the way as well (even though they, as a group, are not as strong as the equivalent group that Oscar fought - Tito, Pea, Mosley, Quartey, Vargas).


    No matter what way I look at this, the answer is Oscar. I believe Floyd had better abilities in his prime, but if we talk strictly resume then Oscar has the edge.
     
  10. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,140
    10,561
    Jul 28, 2009
    His resume of OFFICIAL wins is clearly better. :verysad ODLH is 20-6 against world champions. Officially. You have to be really, really ignorant to think he "lost almost all his big fights".
     
  11. Ashstrodamus

    Ashstrodamus Rodney Dangerfield of ESB Full Member

    368
    1
    Jul 30, 2005
    Hard to take your thread seriously when you left out Trinidad from Oscar's list. DLH easily.
     
  12. Beezy

    Beezy 2 Eazzy Full Member

    4,486
    1
    Jul 31, 2010
    Oscar has the better resume and is higher ATG for me... but I do feel FLoyd will surpass him in both categories......
     
  13. p.falk

    p.falk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,370
    0
    Dec 20, 2006
    Oscar.
    I don't think there's even much debate about it.
     
  14. motorcity

    motorcity Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,390
    0
    Mar 13, 2010
    its fixed.
     
  15. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    can we please stop the oscar lost his biggest fights argument in this? thats as false as mike tyson loses to anyone who isnt afraid of him.