Better resume Mayeather or De la Hoya

Yes, you do need to say more, because that's a ****-weak argument.



Roberto Duran lost the vast majority of his biggest fights with Leonard, Hearns, Hagler and Benitez.

Sven Ottke is unbeaten.

Need we say more? atschatschatsch



Another ****-weak argument exposed with ease. Every day I notice on here that *****s have NO KNOWLEDGE WHATSOEVER!!!!

 

Really? You need a list? You can't think of anyone better than the guys Floyd fought?

At 140: Where Kostya Tszyu ruled. You also had Zab Judah, Vivian Harris, Shamba Mitchell, Ricky Hatton.
At 140: Floyd actually fought: Henry Bruseles, DeMarcus Corley and Arturo Gatti.

At 147: Guys Floyd fought: Zab Judah above his prime weight, Shamba Mitchell above his prime weight, Carlos Baldomir, Ricky Hatton above his prime weight, Shane Mosley 138 years old, JMM, two levels above his prime weight.
At 147, guys he could've fought: Prime(or very close to it)Shane Mosley, Antonio Margarito, Miguel Cotto, Joshua Clottey, Paul Williams, Manny Pacquiao, Kermit Cintron, Andre Berto

In each and every case at both weight classes, I would submit that all the guys on the list that he didn't fight, would beat the guys on the list that he did. Like I said. I'm absolutely certain you have some sort of theory on why each and every one of those guys avoided Floyd instead of vice versa, but the one common denominator is Floyd. And regardless of who's at fault, Floyd failed to get in the ring with the toughest fighters of his era. Lots of guys (DLH included) could've handpicked a bunch of opponents they knew they could beat and kept a spotless record, but they didn't. They tested themselves against the best. Floyd has not done that. And posterity will not be kind to his legacy because of it.

 

Wheres the evidence of Tsyzu. All I know is that he fought Corley then he fight Gatti hoping to fight the Ring champ in Hatton. Hatton declinded so Mayweather tried to fight Cotto and Arum said NO like always. so he had nothing to do but go to 147. tried to fight Mosley but he said he needs a vacation and his tooth hurts

Margarito was a nobody, why fight him when you can fight for the lineal title in Baldmoir?? Williams never even said he wanted to fight Mayweather or Cotto so I dont how any of that is ducking a fighter when they never say they want the fight?

Mayweather then comes back, fights the #2 P4P fighter in the world in Marquez, then fights the lineal champ in Mosley who he tried to fight in 1999 and 2006. you know whats funny? Pacquiao now wants to fight the lightweight 3 years later after his close fight with him in 2008, and he just fought an older Mosley

Mayweather has ducked nobody and is now coming back to fight the #2 WW in the world because the #1 WW doesnt want to fight. Looks like you got burned bro, you can leave now

 

Dont you ever compare DLH to Duran. DLH anit ****.

 

Why are you talking about Duran, Leonard, etc? You were a lump in your inbred dads balls when those guys were active.

So, DLH's losses shouldn't be considered when comparing his resume because Duran lost fights and Ottke is undefeated? How is that relevant to anything?

Another ***git ******* exposed and humiliated smoke

 

And sugar plum faires danced in his head.
:nut

 

what yoy fail to realize is that he wanted to fight Hatton and Cotto at 140 but they didnt want the fight, do you remeber??? Hatton and Cotto were both at the Gatti fight but once they saw Gatti get smashed they ducked Floyd.

147 he tried to fight Mosley, do you guys even follow boxingatschatschatsch

why fight Margarito when you can fight Judah (former undisputed) and the lineal champ (Baldmoir). Berto or Pacquiao was not around in 2009. 2010 Mayweather tried to fight Pacquiao but he didnt take the test so he fought the lineal champ in Mosley. Man I know you guys dont like him but geez, at least try to come with some real info like I did:bbb

 

got no comeback?? didnt think so, thx:good

 

DLH fought the better guys and beat the better guys. Yeah, he didn't win every single big fight because he put his balls on the line. It happens.

 

Typical lame ***** cop-outs because these goons have no knowledge to back up their biased and ill-informed opinions.


If you had a brain, you'd have realized I wasn't comparing anyone to anyone, you'd know that I made an analogy to show the stupidity of the boxing principles at work on this thread. :deal

I could've used countless different names rather than Duran and Ottke to make the exact same point, the names are not important because it's not a comparison:




Thomas Hearns lost to the two best fighters he ever faced: Leonard and Hagler.

Joe Calzaghe retired undefeated.

Need I say more??? :dead



Do you get it now? :think

The point is not that ODLH is as good as Duran or Hearns, the point is that the principle being put forward here (that a guy who retired undefeated is

This content is protected

better in terms of resume than a guy who may or may not have lost most of his biggest fights to his best opponents) is a ****-weak argument.

Class dismissed.

 

Why do you think they simplify every argument or debate? It's because that's all their brains can fathom. They don't see the big picture nor do they take the time to educate themselves properly. Why should they, they already know everything. Just ask em!

 

Forgive me for repeating myself.......Like I said. I'm absolutely certain you have some sort of theory on why each and every one of those guys avoided Floyd instead of vice versa, but the one common denominator is Floyd. And regardless of who's at fault, Floyd failed to get in the ring with the toughest fighters of his era. Lots of guys (DLH included) could've handpicked a bunch of opponents they knew they could beat and kept a spotless record, but they didn't. They tested themselves against the best. Floyd has not done that. And posterity will not be kind to his legacy because of it.

 

Agreed. This buckdacious guy's version of history is definitely skewed.

 

Resume as in who the fought? Or who they beat?