Better resume: Peter Maher vs Earnie Shavers

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 70sFan865, Jul 26, 2020.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007

    See my comments below in orange. Maher was a good contender, but at the end of the day Choynski or Slavin was probably the best fighters he beat. I think Maher shined vs the non elite as all punchers tend to do, but when he fought the next step up, good contenders such as Ruhlin, Goddard or McCoy failed to get above that level. When he fought the greats, ( Jackson, and Fitzsimmons ) he was blown out early twice.

    Maher wins:

    Jim Daly
    Jack Fallon
    George Godfrey -
    This content is protected

    Joe Butler
    Gus Ruhlin -
    This content is protected

    Jim Hall (officially a draw, should have been a win)
    Steve O'Donnell x4
    Frank Slavin -
    This content is protected

    Joe Choynski -
    This content is protected

    CC Smith x2
    Joe Goddard -
    This content is protected

    Ed Dunkhorst
    Joe Kennedy

    I often wondered why Maher never got a shot s Sullivan. Two irishmen going at in would have been a hot ticket in the mid 1880's.
     
    The Long Count likes this.
  2. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,691
    9,890
    Jun 9, 2010
    I think Shavers' definitive win over Norton kinda trumps Maher's over Goddard - quite probably Maher's best win or perhaps his one-out-of-three, over Choynski, takes that badge - Either way, it's just my opinion, but I think this one of Shavers' Wins takes him up a notch or two, over Maher.

    Shavers' Win and subsequent Draw over Young is also probably more noteworthy than Maher's results against, say, Ruhlin (Maher's Win being over a reported 2-0 Ruhlin; subsequently avenged by a more experienced Ruhlin, amongst two additional Draws between them).

    The kind of test that Shavers gave a prime Holmes, which has, in a way, helped immortalized Larry, is probably more noteworthy than Maher's effort against the man of the day, Peter Jackson.

    I think the ignominy of being sparked cold for several minutes by a 165lb Fitzsimmons is perhaps more damaging than Shavers' being caught by a sweet right and put to the canvas against Ron Lyle.


    Of course, opinions will vary and any of the above can be challenged but Shavers, compared to Maher, seems to have the edge, from what I can see, so far.
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2020
    Bujia and George Crowcroft like this.
  3. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Maher was past his prime when he fought McCoy.
    He won their most relevant fight, when both were in their primes.
    The first fight definitely was closer than you may think. Supposedly, Fitzsimmons corner saved him from KO, they cheated with bell and ended the round quicker. I don't know if that was true or not. I'm sure that Maher gave Fitzsimmons tougher fight than most.
    Maher was way past his best.
    He drew the series with Ruhlin.
    Maher was known for the most dangerous puncher of his era. Based on reports he punched harder than Fitzsimmons and I don't see any reason to doubt that he was at least as hard as Jeffries.
    Maher was an old alcoholic in that period. Using his losses from the early 1900s against him is like saying that Ali wasn't that good because he lost some fights in late 1970s.
    It's also not true that he faced better competition later - he faced the best fighters of his era before 1899.
    Again, don't use fights when Maher was an old and addicted man.
     
  4. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Two draws and two fights when one of them wasn't close to his best. I don't agree, he split the series with Ruhlin.
    Maher was an amateur fighter when he faced Jackson.

    Maher did very well against Jeffries top opponents - he split the series with Ruhlin, won the eliminator against Choynski, drew with Sharkey in a close fight and gave Fitzsimmons a great first fight.
     
  5. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Again - Maher was just a novice, amateur fighter in this fight. I'd compare first Fitz fight instead here.
    I disagree, because Fitz was better fighter and puncher than Lyle.
     
  6. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,627
    1,892
    Dec 2, 2006
    Maher did a couple of barn-storming tours, fighting all-comers as he went from city to city. Most were usually the best fighter in the area and sometimes just rank amateurs trying to pick up a few dollars by staying the distance with Maher, Fighters like Jack Bonner, Tom Johnson, George Peters, Zagerzte, McCabe all had more fights than on Boxrec. I also found fights against other nonentities that got blown away. A green Gus Ruhlin was one of Peter's victims on a tour. Inthe main the very a low quality bunch, just had a bit more done than Boxrec records. I add Frank Craig, Klondike, Charlie Stevenson, Yank Kenny, Stockings Conroy to the list of B level fighters that he fought. In fact, he dodged nobody, Corbett avoided him and he just missed out on Jeffries by blowing the McCoy fight. As for Foxcroft, it was an exhibition at a benefit for Maher before he went to America. Foxcroft, a big guardsman, was offered a gold medal if he could stay three rounds with Peter. He did well in the first round but was driven over the ropes twice in the second. Maher was warned that there was to be no knockout so he eased up and Foxcroft got his medal but no decision was rendered. If it was allowed to develope Maher would have undoubtedly won by KO. Don't know where Boxrec got their result from. Shavers too built up his record on mediocre opponents around the States.
     
  7. Bujia

    Bujia Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,564
    2,392
    Jul 2, 2020
    Dude....

    Alright, man. Let’s see these reports. Let’s see anything suggesting what you just said.
     
  8. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,627
    1,892
    Dec 2, 2006
    Some testimonals on Maher; Joe Choynski, who should know, said, “Maher was the last man in the world to get careless with, he was a terrible hitter.”
    James Guider, physical conditioner and former boxer, The Evening World 1925: “Peter Maher, in my opinion, carried the greatest punch of any man who ever lived.”
    Jake Kilrain, former heavyweight claimant: “Maher, I believe punches harder than John (L. Sullivan) ever did in his life.”
    Jim Corbett said of Maher that he “was the greatest hitter that I ever saw” in an interview with Norman E. Brown, published in the Morning Post, New Jersey, on February 28th 1928. “When Maher hit them once, they dropped dead as fish-and stayed out.”
    Boxing scribe Ed Hughes wrote in 1919 “that Maher was probably the hardest hitter-not even barring the present Dempsey or Fitzsimmons-that ever tied on a padded mitt.”
    “The hardest puncher I’ve ever seen was Peter Maher,” noted boxing trainer Dan Hickey, 1926.
    Robert Edgren, the famous writer and cartoonist, stated in 1927, “Peter Maher, a great heavyweight and perhaps the hardest hitter ever known in boxing.”
    Boxing promoter and editor of the Denver Post Otto Floto stated in 1919, after 30 years’ experience of watching fighters, “To our mind Maher could deliver a blow with more power behind it than any other man who ever wore the gloves.”
    Former foe Steve O’Donnell who also had good cause to know, went, “He can strike a harder blow, in my opinion, than any man in the ring today and I doubt very much if his equal in this department ever lived.”
    In 1917 John Dunn, matchmaker, insisted, “Any time any one tells you that Peter Maher wasn’t the hardest hitting human that ever pulled on a glove, send him around to me!”
    Perhaps the greatest tribute to Maher comes from a man who disliked him intently, Tom O’Rourke, famous trainer and promoter. “He was the hardest hitter, bar none, that I ever saw.”
     
    janitor, 70sFan865 and The Long Count like this.
  9. Bujia

    Bujia Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,564
    2,392
    Jul 2, 2020
    I didn’t ask you!
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  10. Bujia

    Bujia Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,564
    2,392
    Jul 2, 2020
    Nah, fair enough, though. Didn’t expect that. He may well have been the Shavers of his time.

    Doesn’t change my opinion on this topic, but it changes my opinion of him relative to his era.
     
    Bukkake and Saintpat like this.
  11. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,691
    9,890
    Jun 9, 2010
    Even so, at this point, I'd still suggest that Shavers adds to Holmes' legacy in a way that Maher does not do to Fitzsimmons'.


    That's fine - We'll just have to agree to disagree, because Ron Lyle was a first-class puncher and could have shone in any era. I obviously recognize Fitzsimmons' pound-4-pound supremacy here but, if were' talking about KO power then, as much as Fitzsimmons was a phenom, he was not, at 165lbs, delivering the kind of dig Lyle could at fifteen-and-a-half stone.

    Maher's chin made Shavers look like Chuvalo.
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  12. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,627
    1,892
    Dec 2, 2006
    Two ko's in eleven years, over a hundred fights...one probably an illegal punch? Mind you I'd rate Earnies better.
     
    70sFan865 and Man_Machine like this.
  13. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    8,877
    Oct 8, 2013
    I like Maher over Cleveland Williams
     
    70sFan865 and mattdonnellon like this.
  14. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,627
    1,892
    Dec 2, 2006
    Can 'o worms!
     
    The Long Count likes this.
  15. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,691
    9,890
    Jun 9, 2010
    Didn't Goddard KO Maher twice, in addition to the Fitz KO?