Better Resume: SRL vs Ali

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by canucks9314, Mar 12, 2012.


  1. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Leonard's best names are better than Ali's.

    Ali's resume is considerably deeper, as he beat top rated heavyweights for a long time and was way more active than Leonard.
     
  3. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    This.
     
  4. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    Ray's eye injury really hurt him. He would've gotten in a lot of names in that time. And would've swept this. I'm going Ali.
     
  5. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Two very different and equally amazing careers. I'd have to go with Ali though.
     
  6. MetalMandible

    MetalMandible Chinchecker Full Member

    7,260
    0
    Jun 9, 2011
    Great thread. I honestly find this one hard to pick for because both have spectacular wins over fellow ATGs, and more than one. With SRL you have wins over Wilfred Benitez, Duran, Hearns, and Hagler and with Ali you have Liston, Patterson, Frazier, and Foreman. I give the edge to Leonard because, while they both fought a who's who of their respective divisions, the Top 4 on Leonard's list were tougher-than-nails legends and just a step above Liston and Patterson.
     
  7. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    I agree, good post :good
     
  8. catnthehat

    catnthehat Pac doesn't deserve 50/50 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Mar 11, 2012
    I feel it's Ali and it isn't close. Ali fought so many fighters in their prime and/or at their physical peak. SRL did not fight nearly as many in their prime.
     
  9. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,594
    722
    Aug 23, 2010
    Ali cleaned out the heavyweight division in the 60s. He came back in the 70s and cleaned out the division again. He has two of the biggest upsets in boxing history. It's Ali without question IMO.
     
  10. fortress

    fortress Member Full Member

    168
    0
    Feb 16, 2012
    Leonard ducked a prime Hagler, he fought him when he was half shot. and Leonard also ducked Pryor, Ali ducked nobody on the other hand
     
  11. Whipdatass

    Whipdatass Boxing Junkie banned

    9,353
    2
    Aug 18, 2011
    Well said. Ali has a deeper resume.
     
  12. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    :think

    Leonard is the perfect example of quality over quantity. I think he nicks this as Hagler, Hearns and Duran are ahead of Frazier and Foreman in a p4p debate.

    Ali's is obviously far deeper, which brings the discussion a lot closer
     
  13. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,735
    5
    Aug 7, 2010
  14. aramini

    aramini Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    7
    Sep 15, 2004
    I think when you watch all of both their carreers, Ali did far more for far longer and did not wait for the opportune time, even fought ocassionally when he was a clear underdog because of age, wear and tear, and still performed well. Leonard stacking the cards agains Lalonde is terrible, and even though he came out far better than Ali health wise his non-prime performances are way more pathetic than Ali's non prime performances.

    Longevity and taking protracted beatings and coming back and still winning and winning and winning make me select Ali, but Leonard's resume is awesome in comparison to just about anybody elses.
     
  15. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Stop with the silly Legendary Nights myths.

    Pryor (who didn't even compete in the same division) turned down a career high payday against Leonard, because he wanted more.