Better resume: Tyson Fury or Frank Bruno?

Is this a joke

 

I'll pray for you brother.

 

Have I come into the wrong forum?

Is this Mumsnet.com?

 

Bruno made a salty comment about Fury being eaten alive in his era.

You compare resumes and it’s no contest.

Fury’s best win is over Klitschko (who was undefeated champion for nearly 10 years prior) would have destroyed Bruno.

Fury’s next best wins are the 3 over Wilder.
We don’t even need to explain what Wilder does to Bruno.

Bruno’s best win is over McCall which involved hanging on for dear life to a UD win. As he was completely gassed out, and was only saved by McCall’s own complete lack of conditioning due to his poor preparation and drug habit.

 

Fury is above Bruno on resume but let's be honest, 3 wins over Wilder, Chisora and one over ancient Wlad do not an ATG resume make. I think Bruno would have given Wilder some problems.

 

Bruno fought Mike Tyson twice, Lennox Lewis, Tim Witherspoon, Oliver McCall, Pierre Coezter, Gerrie Coetzee, Phillip Brown, James "Bone Crusher" Smith while Tyson Fury fought old Wladmir Klistchko and ran from him and the least skilled "champion" in boxing history Deontay Wilder. Clearly Bruno fought better people. In fact the only modern "heavyweight" (So I mean no 180 pound or less guys from years ago) champion who fought worse competition was Deontay Wilder.

 

Fury does not have a resume despite being a boxer for 13 years. Don't believe me? Name his top 5 opponents? I'll wait...

 

Klitschko is an elite win, despite Klitschko being past it. And Wilder is a good albiet highly overrated win

You can add Chisora in there i guess, even though Chisora is a gatekeeper with double digit losses and wasn't very good before hand

Thats about it

 

Hardly a list of Hall of Famers

 

Top 5 wins: Wlad (sauna), Wlad, Wilder, Wilder, Wilder