Better Resume: Vitali Klit vs Joe Cal????

It is pathetic at best. A dribbling ****** could look at the names on the two resumes and come to the correct conclusion, yet a number of voters can't.

This is how far Calzaghe hating has stooped I think. We've even got guys that vote for the other guy on purpose yet despite this claim to be objective in their posts on the matter. Yeah okay, we are going to believe that now atsch

 

You must have been absent the day I went to war with the whole forum because I said (and I still think) that Calzaghe's resume is better than Shane Mosley's. I don't have to be a fan of the guy to take each case on its merits or look at him objectively.

 

Sometimes I think you're a good poster, other times I think you're an attention *****....

Don't get me wrong, I actually think you might have an argument there though you know before you say it how controversial such a view is around here...I don't think it can be denied that Mosley has at least faced the better competition of the two?

 

I was here. That was nice, however you've never exactly spoken about Mosley in glowing terms anyway so you havn't quite turned the corner yet

You'll be telling me its better than Hamed's next.

 

What a silly question vitali is no where near joe, wlads resume is better then vitty, even though wlad would get ktfo by his brother :good

 

Yes, I would agree. He beat DLH convincingly at 147, no mean feat considering he was coming from 135....however whilst Mosley has faced a number of p4p fighters such as Forrest, Wright and Cotto he has came up short more often than not against the very best fighters he has faced....I do not believe he beat DLH in the 2nd fight either.

 

I'll post you a link to the thread. Rather predictably, it degenerated into a vicious hate-filled bitchfest because the very idea was utter blasphemy to Mosley fans, but I genuinely believe Mosley has the most overrated resume in boxing and that Joe's is better all-round.

I think you are a good poster but are pretty biased. I read your Calzaghe-Hopkins resume comparison and found it both strange and amusing, truly subconscious bias at work. If you hadn't wrote the summation finally discussing them directly and had just read the breakdown of either resume, you would think that you had come to the conclusion that Hopkins's resume is clearly stronger. Yet, the summation says equal. But your breakdown does not show equal resumes at all! It's just a little biased paragraph at the end that is pure opinion and not based on the actual evidence discussed that gives the final verdict as equal.

 

Calzaghe and Mosley have better resumes than Hamed. Naz's res is bollocks IMO.

 

That was kinda my point, I know your opinion on his resume

 

Fair enough, I knew that would get the Mosley fans worked up (and there are many here) if you said that as you are of course known to be a fierce Calzaghe critic at least in terms of his resume...so to say JC is superior in that respect would really be asking for trouble!

I'll return to that thread and review it...it's my opinion that they have very similar resumes in terms of worth, though Hopkins has undeniably faced the better competition though unlike Joe, he has lost multiple fights usually against the best opponents he has faced.

 

You CAN'T be serious about this.