Gotta go with Wlad here, he has fought all of his mandatory challengers and rivals while Floyd has picked and chosen his opposition. He also KOs his opponents something the brittle fisted Mayweather can't do with any regularity.
Wlad fought all mandatories, all top fighters in his division, never cried about gloves, Bob Arum, promoters or testing, never retired to duck, never went to prison, never beat a woman, never ducked anyone. He never drained his opponents to catch-weights or cheated anyone on scales. Floyd has never fought an A level opponent in his prime/near prime at the correct weight. Floyd's best win is Cotto, 152 Drainelo doesn't count, blown up, fat and slow Marquez doesn't count. Wlad's wins over Schultz, Ibragimov, Chagaev, Povetkin, Haye and Byrd x2 crap all over Floyd's resume. And he's about to fight #1 guy Pulev. Who has Floyd chosen to fight? Oh Maidana
You won't, beause it cant be done. Wlads resume is about a 3 out of 10. Floyd's is about a 7 of of 10. Above average, but not great. Wlads resume in comparison is below average. Not his fault his heavyweight era sucks, but the fact remains.
Lol, wtf does that have to do with anything? Floyd accomplished more at SFW than Wlad has in his entire career.
When Heavyweight fans was clamoring for Klitschko v Haye, Povetkin, Peter, what did Wlad do? Fight them. When everyone wanted Mayweather v Pacquiao, Margarito, Cotto at ww, did Mayweather fight them? Nope. Get off Floyd's nuts.
Klitschko has iced Byrd twice, Povetkin, Chagaev and the like while Mayweather fan boys will try and tell us that the likes of an obese, drug addict, alcoholic chancer like Hatton and a green infant like the plodder Canelo are somehow better than the greats Klitschko has locked horns with. You couldn't make this **** up.
I'm sorry but judging resumes has nothing to do with who they did not fight. Only with who they actually fought.