Better trilogy Gatti/Ward or Marquez/Vazquez?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jgorst05, Jun 17, 2009.


  1. jgorst05

    jgorst05 Active Member Full Member

    1,377
    0
    Aug 27, 2008
    when i saw gatti/ward 3 i didnt think id see a more enjoyable trilogy, and then, marquez/vazquez happened. Both were ****ing awesome for us fans but in my opinion i enjoyed the latter more, mainly i think because not only did they go to war they were also exceptionally skilled boxers who were at the time the two top dogs at there weight. What do you guys think as fans? Which gave you the most exitement?
     
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,081
    3,675
    Jun 30, 2005
    Vazquez-Marquez, definitely.

    Barrera-Morales is 2nd among trilogies this decade.
     
  3. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,009
    2
    May 1, 2009
    I'd say the Vazquez/Marquez for the same reasons, same amount of action, higher level of skill.
     
  4. jgorst05

    jgorst05 Active Member Full Member

    1,377
    0
    Aug 27, 2008
    EM V MAB was a hell of a trilogy too, your right. Out of interest who did you give fights 1 and 2 if you were a judge?
     
  5. zato-one

    zato-one Pink Jumpsuit Boxing Full Member

    4,081
    51
    Dec 5, 2007
    personally I consider EM vs MAB to be top...Then Marquez/Vazquez.....THEN gatti ward.
    Sorry, but the amount that em and mab ACTUALLY hated each other, just threw so much more emotion in it. Plus I love morales :D
     
  6. dmille

    dmille We knew, about Tszyu, before you. Full Member

    2,270
    71
    Aug 1, 2004
    Vasquez-Marquez is a better trilogy because all three fights were top-notch action fights. The second and third Gatti-Ward fights are slightly over-rated.
     
  7. Rowsdower

    Rowsdower New Member Full Member

    58
    0
    Oct 29, 2008
    Gotta go with vasquez-marquez, the fact that there were 2 stoppages in the trilogy is unique, and the fact that they were both the best in their divison, and we still have a chance for a fourth bout!
     
  8. superchile

    superchile Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,939
    1
    Jan 18, 2008
    vazquez vs marquez indeed
     
  9. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Vasquez vs Marquez.
     
  10. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Vazquez - Marquez by a good, wide margin. Better level of overall skill and everyone of their fights was a fight of the year candidate. You can't say the same about Gatti - Ward. Plus, every fight of the Vazquez - Marquez trilogy got progressively better as the series went on, and with Gatti - Ward you got the best fight right off the bat and the next two didn't quite live up to the original.
     
  11. manhattanboxer3

    manhattanboxer3 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,358
    0
    May 26, 2009
  12. Martini643

    Martini643 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,457
    1
    Aug 31, 2004
    Marquez/Vazquez def

    This fight was intense, I was out of my chair all 3 fights. I think it was a bit better because of the skills of the fighters. Marquez is a top p4p fighter, to see him in a dog fight like that was great.
     
  13. BlueBoxing

    BlueBoxing Active Member Full Member

    744
    0
    May 12, 2009
    Ward - Gatti for me.
     
  14. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    both were excellent

    if comparison is a must, marquez/vazquez
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Marquez-Vasquez. Gatti and Ward are just journeymen who are super durable.