Better victories: Pac over Morales and Barrera or Floyd over Chico and Castillo

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Danny_Rand, May 24, 2009.


  1. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Don't take this wrong, but you're kind of full of shite. I saw how Barrera fought Hamed, and saw how he fought PAc, and I saw a difference. Styles is one thing, but you still have to fight back, and Barrera always fought back. It happens in boxing. In one fight you can appear slower, and feel older.

    You say Barrera was in his prime, and I say he wasn't. Barrera had been fighting since he was 15 and was fighting top comp for many years before he fought Pac. Same with Morales. It is similiar to how Jones fought the top guys in their prime at lh, and how Tarver faced those guys years after Jones did. Tarver's body was fined tuned while Jones was road worn. PAc beating Barrera, Morales, and Larios are good wins, not great.
     
  2. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    136
    Jul 20, 2004
    please ***** you´ve started more threads about trannies in the lounge with your friend anut than i have about fraud.
     
  3. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Oh, my feelings are sooooo hurt lol...:lol: You must be pissed at me lol...
     
  4. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Of course if you include anut then it's more.

    Way to go on that one. :lol:
     
  5. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,302
    Jan 4, 2005
    Pac was a champ by 19, and is considered prime now 30. Dont give me that BS. Yea Hamed & Pac are 2 different guys, Pac is a whole lot faster and punche sin combinations, when you have 5 powerful shots coming at you at a time, you cant simply fight back against that. He tried, and he got beat everytime they stood and trade.#3 p4p and after that beat Morales more convincingly than ever to win the SFW championship, a Morales who was good enough to beat Pac in his next fight. MAB was prime. Your full of ****.
     
  6. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Do you know how many champs have won titles at 19 in those lower divisions??? You could have 8 fights and be 8 years old and get a title shot:lol:. Pac has 3 losses and two draws, and his fans believe he is better than Floyd in every way. They try to sell us that Barrera and Morales were prime, and that Pac is a legend already lol. Please. You not only can't or wouldn't want to see the truth, you can't even see the face of the chick in your avy lol...
     
  7. TanstA

    TanstA Legendary Full Member

    1,428
    0
    Mar 13, 2007
  8. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    :nut
     
  9. TroubleLurks

    TroubleLurks **** spell check Full Member

    2,765
    0
    May 23, 2006
  10. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    3 losses and two draws are better than the "0" lol... Close the poll...lol.
     
  11. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    This content is protected
     
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    so if I understood correctly, its not ok to say that Corrales was weight drained, was facing jail time, and was about to get divorced... but its ok to say that Morales was past it...

    double standards anyone?

    If you're gonna say no excuses, then its no excuses all around. In which case Barrera and Morales >>>>> Castillo and Corrales. And if you're gonna start popping off excuses left and right, then expect the same **** to come down the other way, and so in that case Barrera and Morales >>>>> Castillo and Corrales.

    So either way all this poll shows is that at least 20% of people on ESB have their heads in the sand.
     
  13. TroubleLurks

    TroubleLurks **** spell check Full Member

    2,765
    0
    May 23, 2006
    He's clean now so....

    [url]
    This content is protected
    [/url]
     
  14. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Morales was past it. Corrales was undefeated, was a champion at the weight and would go on to be the champion at the weight again when he lost to Floyd. Morales on the other hand lost to C level Raheem BEFORE Pac beat him. The same Raheem that Acelino Frietas beat in their next fight. The same frietas that Corrales TKO'd 2 fights before that. Are you saying Morales was prime? Really?

    There is no double standard. Corrales would go on to have a good career. Morales would never win another bout. You could argue Barrera, but its clear his best days were behind him aswell. Both Corrales and Castillo made the P4P top 10 after losing to Mayweather. Them is the facts.
     
  15. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,302
    Jan 4, 2005

    Yet you keep ignoring the fact that Raheem fight was at 135 where Morales came in completely unmotivated. How is it relevant to a fight at 130 with Pac? Hatton would have gotten destroyed by top 5 WW, he still owned JWW.